TY - JOUR
T1 - Analysis of two-phase ejector performance metrics and comparison of R134a and CO2 ejector performance
AU - Lawrence, Neal
AU - Elbel, Stefan
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015, ASHRAE.
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - Two-phase ejector studies in recent years have shown that the performance of an ejector cycle is strongly dependent on the performance of the ejector. However, measuring the performance of a two-phase ejector is not always straightforward. In the present study, several differentmetrics that have been proposed formeasuring the performance of ejectors are presented and analyzed. Performance metrics originally proposed for single-phase ejectors as well as those proposed specifically for two-phase ejectors are both considered. A simple numerical ejector model is used to simulate ejector operation and calculate the performance of the ejector based on the various performance metrics. The various ejector performance metrics are then compared based on the numerical results. Experimental data from previous studies for R134a and CO2 two-phase ejectors is also presented, and the ejector performance metrics are compared based on the available experimental data as well. It is seen that for a given ejector operating point, the different performance metrics can yield very different values. Based on the data from available ejector studies, it seems that CO2 ejectors can achieve somewhat better performance than R134a ejectors. It is also seen that better ejector performance does not necessarily correlate to better ejector cycle performance.
AB - Two-phase ejector studies in recent years have shown that the performance of an ejector cycle is strongly dependent on the performance of the ejector. However, measuring the performance of a two-phase ejector is not always straightforward. In the present study, several differentmetrics that have been proposed formeasuring the performance of ejectors are presented and analyzed. Performance metrics originally proposed for single-phase ejectors as well as those proposed specifically for two-phase ejectors are both considered. A simple numerical ejector model is used to simulate ejector operation and calculate the performance of the ejector based on the various performance metrics. The various ejector performance metrics are then compared based on the numerical results. Experimental data from previous studies for R134a and CO2 two-phase ejectors is also presented, and the ejector performance metrics are compared based on the available experimental data as well. It is seen that for a given ejector operating point, the different performance metrics can yield very different values. Based on the data from available ejector studies, it seems that CO2 ejectors can achieve somewhat better performance than R134a ejectors. It is also seen that better ejector performance does not necessarily correlate to better ejector cycle performance.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84940398021&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84940398021&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/23744731.2015.1030327
DO - 10.1080/23744731.2015.1030327
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84940398021
SN - 2374-4731
VL - 21
SP - 515
EP - 525
JO - Science and Technology for the Built Environment
JF - Science and Technology for the Built Environment
IS - 5
ER -