Analysis of microseismicity and reactivated fault size to assess the potential for felt events by co2 injection in the illinois basin

Sherilyn Williams-Stroud, Robert Bauer, Hannes Leetaru, Volker Oye, Frantisek Stanek, Sallie Greenberg, Nadege Langet

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The results of monitoring of carbon dioxide (CO2 ) injection at the Illinois Basin—Decatur Project (IBDP) and the companion Illinois Industrial Carbon Capture and Sequestration Sources (IL-ICCS) project—have shown that reservoir response to fluid pressure changes can vary significantly at different injection locations within the same reservoir. Predrill reservoir characterization is important to identify potentially seismogenic faults. However, interpretations of newly reprocessed 3D seismic reflection data illustrate the challenges related to their identification in a region dominated by faulting with small vertical offsets. Faults interpreted in the 3D seismic volume range from ∼ 300 to 1200 m wide and are in the same size range as faults that could have been the source of historical events up to Mw 2.7 in central Illinois. The array of monitoring sensors that was installed for the IBDP continues to collect data, as injection operates in IL-ICCS, the second injection well. CO2 injection rates for the IL-ICCS well are on average 1.7 times the rates injected in the IBDP well, but a significantly reduced rate of induced seismicity is observed. This article presents results of passive seismic monitoring for the duration of the project to date, integrating active and passive seismic data to develop a new interpretation of the subsurface structure at the Decatur site that explicitly identifies pathways for fluid flow into the basement leading to induced seismicity, and provides a geological explanation for the sharp reduction of induced seismicity during injection at higher rates into the second well. The use of seismic moment to estimate the length of seismogenic slip planes in the local subsurface suggests that faults large enough to produce felt seismicity are unlikely to be present at or near the Decatur site.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2188-2204
Number of pages17
JournalBulletin of the Seismological Society of America
Volume110
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2020

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geophysics
  • Geochemistry and Petrology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Analysis of microseismicity and reactivated fault size to assess the potential for felt events by co<sub>2</sub> injection in the illinois basin'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this