An integrated methodology for spatio-temporal incorporation of underlying failure mechanisms into fire probabilistic risk assessment of nuclear power plants

Tatsuya Sakurahara, Zahra Mohaghegh, Seyed Reihani, Ernie Kee, Mark Brandyberry, Shawn Rodgers

Research output: Research - peer-reviewArticle

Abstract

In this research, an Integrated probabilistic risk assessment (I-PRA) methodological framework for Fire PRA is developed to provide a unified multi-level probabilistic integration, beginning with spatio-temporal simulation-based models of underlying failure mechanisms (i.e., physical phenomena and human actions), connecting to component-level failures, and then linking to system-level risk scenarios in classical PRA. The simulation-based module, called the fire simulation module (FSM), includes state-of-the-art models of fire initiation, fire progression, post-fire failure damage propagation, fire brigade response, and scenario-based damage. Fire progression is simulated using a CFD code, fire dynamics simulator (FDS), which solves Navier–Stokes equations governing the turbulent flow field. Uncertainty quantification is conducted to address parameter uncertainties. The I-PRA paves the way for reducing excessive conservatisms derived from the modeling of (i) fire progression and damage and (ii) the interactions between fire progression and manual suppression. Global importance measure analysis is used to rank the risk-contributing factors. A case study demonstrates the implementation of I-PRA for a regulatory-documented fire scenario.

LanguageEnglish (US)
Pages242-257
Number of pages16
JournalReliability Engineering and System Safety
Volume169
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Uncertainty
Navier Stokes equations
Turbulent flow
Computational fluid dynamics
Simulators

Keywords

  • Common cause failure
  • Fire brigade
  • Fire dynamics simulator (FDS)
  • Fire human reliability analysis (HRA)
  • Fire probabilistic risk assessment (PRA)
  • Global importance measure
  • Integrated probabilistic risk assessment (I-PRA)
  • Simulation-based PRA
  • Uncertainty analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering

Cite this

An integrated methodology for spatio-temporal incorporation of underlying failure mechanisms into fire probabilistic risk assessment of nuclear power plants. / Sakurahara, Tatsuya; Mohaghegh, Zahra; Reihani, Seyed; Kee, Ernie; Brandyberry, Mark; Rodgers, Shawn.

In: Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Vol. 169, 01.01.2018, p. 242-257.

Research output: Research - peer-reviewArticle

@article{8b213ccb323649e8bc2841bd4eff2d52,
title = "An integrated methodology for spatio-temporal incorporation of underlying failure mechanisms into fire probabilistic risk assessment of nuclear power plants",
abstract = "In this research, an Integrated probabilistic risk assessment (I-PRA) methodological framework for Fire PRA is developed to provide a unified multi-level probabilistic integration, beginning with spatio-temporal simulation-based models of underlying failure mechanisms (i.e., physical phenomena and human actions), connecting to component-level failures, and then linking to system-level risk scenarios in classical PRA. The simulation-based module, called the fire simulation module (FSM), includes state-of-the-art models of fire initiation, fire progression, post-fire failure damage propagation, fire brigade response, and scenario-based damage. Fire progression is simulated using a CFD code, fire dynamics simulator (FDS), which solves Navier–Stokes equations governing the turbulent flow field. Uncertainty quantification is conducted to address parameter uncertainties. The I-PRA paves the way for reducing excessive conservatisms derived from the modeling of (i) fire progression and damage and (ii) the interactions between fire progression and manual suppression. Global importance measure analysis is used to rank the risk-contributing factors. A case study demonstrates the implementation of I-PRA for a regulatory-documented fire scenario.",
keywords = "Common cause failure, Fire brigade, Fire dynamics simulator (FDS), Fire human reliability analysis (HRA), Fire probabilistic risk assessment (PRA), Global importance measure, Integrated probabilistic risk assessment (I-PRA), Simulation-based PRA, Uncertainty analysis",
author = "Tatsuya Sakurahara and Zahra Mohaghegh and Seyed Reihani and Ernie Kee and Mark Brandyberry and Shawn Rodgers",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ress.2017.09.001",
volume = "169",
pages = "242--257",
journal = "Reliability Engineering and System Safety",
issn = "0951-8320",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An integrated methodology for spatio-temporal incorporation of underlying failure mechanisms into fire probabilistic risk assessment of nuclear power plants

AU - Sakurahara,Tatsuya

AU - Mohaghegh,Zahra

AU - Reihani,Seyed

AU - Kee,Ernie

AU - Brandyberry,Mark

AU - Rodgers,Shawn

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - In this research, an Integrated probabilistic risk assessment (I-PRA) methodological framework for Fire PRA is developed to provide a unified multi-level probabilistic integration, beginning with spatio-temporal simulation-based models of underlying failure mechanisms (i.e., physical phenomena and human actions), connecting to component-level failures, and then linking to system-level risk scenarios in classical PRA. The simulation-based module, called the fire simulation module (FSM), includes state-of-the-art models of fire initiation, fire progression, post-fire failure damage propagation, fire brigade response, and scenario-based damage. Fire progression is simulated using a CFD code, fire dynamics simulator (FDS), which solves Navier–Stokes equations governing the turbulent flow field. Uncertainty quantification is conducted to address parameter uncertainties. The I-PRA paves the way for reducing excessive conservatisms derived from the modeling of (i) fire progression and damage and (ii) the interactions between fire progression and manual suppression. Global importance measure analysis is used to rank the risk-contributing factors. A case study demonstrates the implementation of I-PRA for a regulatory-documented fire scenario.

AB - In this research, an Integrated probabilistic risk assessment (I-PRA) methodological framework for Fire PRA is developed to provide a unified multi-level probabilistic integration, beginning with spatio-temporal simulation-based models of underlying failure mechanisms (i.e., physical phenomena and human actions), connecting to component-level failures, and then linking to system-level risk scenarios in classical PRA. The simulation-based module, called the fire simulation module (FSM), includes state-of-the-art models of fire initiation, fire progression, post-fire failure damage propagation, fire brigade response, and scenario-based damage. Fire progression is simulated using a CFD code, fire dynamics simulator (FDS), which solves Navier–Stokes equations governing the turbulent flow field. Uncertainty quantification is conducted to address parameter uncertainties. The I-PRA paves the way for reducing excessive conservatisms derived from the modeling of (i) fire progression and damage and (ii) the interactions between fire progression and manual suppression. Global importance measure analysis is used to rank the risk-contributing factors. A case study demonstrates the implementation of I-PRA for a regulatory-documented fire scenario.

KW - Common cause failure

KW - Fire brigade

KW - Fire dynamics simulator (FDS)

KW - Fire human reliability analysis (HRA)

KW - Fire probabilistic risk assessment (PRA)

KW - Global importance measure

KW - Integrated probabilistic risk assessment (I-PRA)

KW - Simulation-based PRA

KW - Uncertainty analysis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85029596458&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85029596458&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ress.2017.09.001

DO - 10.1016/j.ress.2017.09.001

M3 - Article

VL - 169

SP - 242

EP - 257

JO - Reliability Engineering and System Safety

T2 - Reliability Engineering and System Safety

JF - Reliability Engineering and System Safety

SN - 0951-8320

ER -