TY - JOUR
T1 - An integrated four-year hands-on design curriculum
T2 - 126th ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition: Charged Up for the Next 125 Years, ASEE 2019
AU - Jassim, Emad W.
AU - Johnson, Blake Everett
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors wish to thank the present and past UIUC MechSE faculty and staff involved in formulating the Design Stem and compilation of data, including Stephanie Ott-Monsivais, Ralf Moller, Drs. Steve Downing (junior level mechanical design course SIIP principal investigator), Bruce Flachsbart, Itay Grinberg, Leon Liebenberg, Brian Mercer, and Profs. Armand Beaudoin, Alison Dunn, Placid Ferreira, Liz Hsiao-Wecksler (iDesign SIIP principal investigator), Seok Kim, Hae Won Park, Mike Philpott, Andreas Polycarpou, Darrell Socie, Sameh Tawfick, Arend van der Zande, and Aimy Wissa. The authors would like to thank Chris Marry, Nicholas Thompson, and Nathaniel Speidel, graduate students who evaluated past project reports for the longitudinal study. Finally, the authors would like to thank the UIUC College of Engineering Academy for Excellence in Engineering Education for their financial support and guidance.
Publisher Copyright:
© American Society for Engineering Education, 2019
PY - 2019/6/15
Y1 - 2019/6/15
N2 - A review of the literature supports a hands-on curricular approach as a means to improve learning of engineering concepts and increase student retention. Many institutions incorporate hands-on design courses in their curricula, but few institutions offer an integrated hands-on design course sequence for all four undergraduate years. This paper is a case study of the development of a four-year integrated hands-on design curriculum to motivate, retain, and prepare mechanical engineering students for success in their capstone (senior) design course and future careers. Over a period of ten years, a team of faculty members have incorporated hands-on design components into a sequence of five mechanical design courses, as well as an introductory fluid mechanics laboratory course. Courses in all four years of instruction (Freshman: Computer-Aided Design; Sophomore: Design for Manufacturability; Junior: Mechanical Design I and Mechanical Design II, Fundamentals of Fluid Dynamics Laboratory; Senior: Capstone Design Project) have been revised to utilize a common design process, reporting guidelines, drawing standards, ideation methods, and Innovation Studio. This paper outlines the hands-on integrated design sequence development over time, and highlights changes made to each of the courses. Assessment of student work in the senior capstone course over the years of interest suggests that students are becoming more proficient in aspects of real-world hands-on design projects and that their ability to work effectively as a team is improving. Retention is also found to increase over the period of interest. Challenges to implementation such as financial resources to support the facilities and fabrication materials, qualified teaching assistant availability, and faculty buy-in are discussed.
AB - A review of the literature supports a hands-on curricular approach as a means to improve learning of engineering concepts and increase student retention. Many institutions incorporate hands-on design courses in their curricula, but few institutions offer an integrated hands-on design course sequence for all four undergraduate years. This paper is a case study of the development of a four-year integrated hands-on design curriculum to motivate, retain, and prepare mechanical engineering students for success in their capstone (senior) design course and future careers. Over a period of ten years, a team of faculty members have incorporated hands-on design components into a sequence of five mechanical design courses, as well as an introductory fluid mechanics laboratory course. Courses in all four years of instruction (Freshman: Computer-Aided Design; Sophomore: Design for Manufacturability; Junior: Mechanical Design I and Mechanical Design II, Fundamentals of Fluid Dynamics Laboratory; Senior: Capstone Design Project) have been revised to utilize a common design process, reporting guidelines, drawing standards, ideation methods, and Innovation Studio. This paper outlines the hands-on integrated design sequence development over time, and highlights changes made to each of the courses. Assessment of student work in the senior capstone course over the years of interest suggests that students are becoming more proficient in aspects of real-world hands-on design projects and that their ability to work effectively as a team is improving. Retention is also found to increase over the period of interest. Challenges to implementation such as financial resources to support the facilities and fabrication materials, qualified teaching assistant availability, and faculty buy-in are discussed.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85078784740&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85078784740&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.18260/1-2--32068
DO - 10.18260/1-2--32068
M3 - Conference article
AN - SCOPUS:85078784740
SN - 2153-5965
JO - ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings
JF - ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings
Y2 - 15 June 2019 through 19 June 2019
ER -