An information processing theory of ambivalence

Thomas J. Rudolph, Elizabeth Popp

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This paper analyzes the sources of ambivalence toward political parties and candidates. We propose and test an information-processing theory of ambivalence in which systematic processing is hypothesized to heighten partisan and candidate ambivalence. We show that ambivalence is linked to several dispositional sources of systematic processing, including individuals' information, motivation, and cognitive style. Specifically, we find that ambivalence tends to be greater among the well informed and those who are high in need for cognition while it tends to be lower among those motivated by directional goals. Collectively, our results suggest that levels of partisan and candidate ambivalence are greatest among those most likely to engage in effortful processing of information and that these effects are independent of value conflict. The results further suggest that the effects of effortful processing on ambivalence are moderated by attitude commitment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)563-585
Number of pages23
JournalPolitical Psychology
Volume28
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2007

Keywords

  • Ambivalence
  • Information processing
  • Motivated reasoning
  • Need for cognition

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Philosophy
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Political Science and International Relations

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'An information processing theory of ambivalence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this