TY - JOUR
T1 - An evaluation of the liquid cloud droplet effective radius derived from MODIS, airborne remote sensing, and in situ measurements from CAMP2Ex
AU - Fu, Dongwei
AU - Di Girolamo, Larry
AU - Rauber, Robert M.
AU - McFarquhar, Greg M.
AU - Nesbitt, Stephen W.
AU - Loveridge, Jesse
AU - Hong, Yulan
AU - Van Diedenhoven, Bastiaan
AU - Cairns, Brian
AU - Alexandrov, Mikhail D.
AU - Lawson, Paul
AU - Woods, Sarah
AU - Tanelli, Simone
AU - Schmidt, Sebastian
AU - Hostetler, Chris
AU - Scarino, Amy Jo
N1 - Acknowledgements. The authors would like to acknowledge funding support from NASA (see details in Financial Support) and the program manager, Hal Maring. We thank all of the members of the CAMP2Ex team for their hard work in collecting the datasets analyzed herein. We also thank Guangyu Zhao for his help in providing reprojected overlays of ASTER and MODIS data. We are grateful for the discussion with Graeme Stephens and for comments from the two anonymous reviewers.
manuscript. The methodology was developed by DF and LDG. LDG, JL, BvD, YH, GMM, RMR, and SWN helped with the writing and editing of the manuscript at various stages. The Research Scanning Polarimeter retrievals used in this study were supported by BC, MA, and BvD. PL and SW collected, processed, and curated the in situ measurements used in this study. APR-3 data were supported by TS, and OOS collected, processed, and curated these data. CH and AJS collected, processed, and curated the HSRL-2 dataset. SeS provided the SPN-S dataset, and YH derived SPN-S transmittance. All authors contributed to editing the manuscript.
PY - 2022/6/27
Y1 - 2022/6/27
N2 - The cloud drop effective radius (Re) of the drop size distribution derived from passive satellite sensors is a key variable used in climate research. Validation of these satellite products has often taken place under stratiform cloud conditions that favor the assumption of cloud horizontal homogeneity used by the retrieval techniques. However, many studies have noted concerns with respect to significant biases in retrieved Re arising from cloud heterogeneity, for example, in cumulus cloud fields. Here, we examine data collected during the 2019 "Cloud, Aerosol and Monsoon Processes Philippines Experiment"(CAMP2Ex), which, in part, targeted the objective of providing the first detailed evaluation of Re retrieved across multiple platforms and techniques in a cumulus and congestus cloud region. Our evaluation consists of cross-comparisons of Re between the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) onboard the Terra satellite, the Research Scanning Polarimeter (RSP) onboard the NASA P-3 aircraft, and in situ measurements from both the NASA P-3 and Learjet aircraft that are all taken in close spatiotemporal proximity to the same cloud fields. A particular advantage of our approach lies in the capability of the RSP to retrieve Re using a bi-spectral MODIS approach and a polarimetric approach, which allows for the evaluation of bi-spectral and polarimetric Re retrievals from an airborne perspective using the same samples. Averaged over all P-3 flight segments examined here for warm clouds, the RSP polarimetric method, the in situ method, and the bias-adjusted MODIS method of Fu et al. (2019) show a comparable median (meang ±g standard deviation) for the Re samples of 9.6 (10.2g ±g 4.0)g μm, 11.0 (13.6g ±g 11.3)g μm, and 10.4 (10.8g ±g 3.8)g μm, respectively. These values are far lower than the values of 15.1 (16.2g ±g 5.5)g μm and 17.2 (17.7g ±g 5.7)g μm from the bi-spectral retrievals of RSP and MODIS, respectively. Similar results are observed when Re is segregated by cloud-top height and in detailed case studies. The clouds sampled during CAMP2Ex consist of mostly small (mean transect length ∼g 1.4g km) and low clouds (mean cloud-top height ∼g 1g km), which had more numerous small clouds than the trade wind cumuli sampled in past field campaigns such as Rain in Shallow Cumulus over the Ocean (RICO) and the Indian Ocean Experiment (INDOEX). The overestimates of Re from the RSP bi-spectral technique compared with the polarimetric technique increased as cloud size and cloud optical depth decreased. Drizzle, cloud-top bumpiness, and solar zenith angle, however, are not closely correlated with the overestimate of bi-spectral Re. For shallow clouds that dominated the liquid cloud cover for the CAMP2Ex region and period, we show that 3-D radiative transfer and cloud heterogeneity, particularly for the optically thin and small clouds, appear to be the leading cause of the large positive biases in bi-spectral retrievals. Because this bias varies with the underlying structure of the cloud field, caution continues to be warranted in studies that use bi-spectral Re retrievals in cumulus cloud fields.
AB - The cloud drop effective radius (Re) of the drop size distribution derived from passive satellite sensors is a key variable used in climate research. Validation of these satellite products has often taken place under stratiform cloud conditions that favor the assumption of cloud horizontal homogeneity used by the retrieval techniques. However, many studies have noted concerns with respect to significant biases in retrieved Re arising from cloud heterogeneity, for example, in cumulus cloud fields. Here, we examine data collected during the 2019 "Cloud, Aerosol and Monsoon Processes Philippines Experiment"(CAMP2Ex), which, in part, targeted the objective of providing the first detailed evaluation of Re retrieved across multiple platforms and techniques in a cumulus and congestus cloud region. Our evaluation consists of cross-comparisons of Re between the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) onboard the Terra satellite, the Research Scanning Polarimeter (RSP) onboard the NASA P-3 aircraft, and in situ measurements from both the NASA P-3 and Learjet aircraft that are all taken in close spatiotemporal proximity to the same cloud fields. A particular advantage of our approach lies in the capability of the RSP to retrieve Re using a bi-spectral MODIS approach and a polarimetric approach, which allows for the evaluation of bi-spectral and polarimetric Re retrievals from an airborne perspective using the same samples. Averaged over all P-3 flight segments examined here for warm clouds, the RSP polarimetric method, the in situ method, and the bias-adjusted MODIS method of Fu et al. (2019) show a comparable median (meang ±g standard deviation) for the Re samples of 9.6 (10.2g ±g 4.0)g μm, 11.0 (13.6g ±g 11.3)g μm, and 10.4 (10.8g ±g 3.8)g μm, respectively. These values are far lower than the values of 15.1 (16.2g ±g 5.5)g μm and 17.2 (17.7g ±g 5.7)g μm from the bi-spectral retrievals of RSP and MODIS, respectively. Similar results are observed when Re is segregated by cloud-top height and in detailed case studies. The clouds sampled during CAMP2Ex consist of mostly small (mean transect length ∼g 1.4g km) and low clouds (mean cloud-top height ∼g 1g km), which had more numerous small clouds than the trade wind cumuli sampled in past field campaigns such as Rain in Shallow Cumulus over the Ocean (RICO) and the Indian Ocean Experiment (INDOEX). The overestimates of Re from the RSP bi-spectral technique compared with the polarimetric technique increased as cloud size and cloud optical depth decreased. Drizzle, cloud-top bumpiness, and solar zenith angle, however, are not closely correlated with the overestimate of bi-spectral Re. For shallow clouds that dominated the liquid cloud cover for the CAMP2Ex region and period, we show that 3-D radiative transfer and cloud heterogeneity, particularly for the optically thin and small clouds, appear to be the leading cause of the large positive biases in bi-spectral retrievals. Because this bias varies with the underlying structure of the cloud field, caution continues to be warranted in studies that use bi-spectral Re retrievals in cumulus cloud fields.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85133492743&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85133492743&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.5194/acp-22-8259-2022
DO - 10.5194/acp-22-8259-2022
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85133492743
SN - 1680-7316
VL - 22
SP - 8259
EP - 8285
JO - Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
JF - Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
IS - 12
ER -