An ER-fMRI investigation of morphological inflection in German reveals that the brain makes a distinction between regular and irregular forms

Alan Beretta, Carrie Campbell, Thomas H. Carr, Jie Huang, Lothar M. Schmitt, Kiel Christianson, Yue Cao

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The hypothesis that morphological processing is supported by a mental dictionary of stored entries plus a set of mental computations based on rules is examined using event-related fMRI. If a rules-plus-memory model (Pinker, 1999) reflects the actual organization of the language faculty, two distinct patterns of brain activation should be observed for production of German irregular and regular noun and verb inflections. If a connectionist alternative to the rules-and-memory model (Rumelhart & McClelland, 1986, and many others since), which seeks to explain the production of both irregular and regular forms within a single associative memory mechanism, is correct, there should be no neural differentiation between German regular and irregular inflection. The results we report support the existence of substantially differing patterns of activation for regulars vs. irregulars, an outcome that is consistent with the two-component rules-plus-memory account.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)67-92
Number of pages26
JournalBrain and Language
Volume85
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2003
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Connectionism
  • fMRI
  • German inflection
  • Mental lexicon
  • Words and rules

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • General Neuroscience

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'An ER-fMRI investigation of morphological inflection in German reveals that the brain makes a distinction between regular and irregular forms'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this