An engineering economic evaluation of quick germ quick fiber process for dry-grind ethanol facilities

Changying Li, Luis F Rodriguez, Madhu Khanna, Aslihan D. Spaulding, Steven R. Eckhoff

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

Abstract

An engineering economic model which is mass balance and compositionally driven was developed to compare the conventional corn dry-grind process and the preseparation process called "Quick Germ/Quick Fiber" (QQ). The QQ process combines a wet milling front end with a dry-grind back end to recover the germ and coarse fiber (pericarp) before fermentation. In this model, the DDGS price was linked with its protein and fiber content as well as with the long term average relationship between DDGS, soybean meal, and corn prices. The detailed economic analysis showed that the payback time for the QQ plant retrofitted from conventional dry grind ethanol plant is only 1.01 years and the QQ process reduces the manufacturing cost of ethanol by 18.6 φ/gal. Sensitivity analysis was also conducted to compare retrofitted plant and conventional dry-grind plant overall revenue at different corn price, ethanol price, and corn compositions. Ethanol and feedstock price sensitivity analysis showed the QQ plant gains more profits when ethanol price increases, and are less sensitive to feedstock price change than conventional dry-grind ethanol plant. The payback time for the QQ process also varies depending on protein content in corn.

Original languageEnglish (US)
StatePublished - Nov 7 2007
Event2007 ASABE Annual International Meeting, Technical Papers - Minneapolis, MN, United States
Duration: Jun 17 2007Jun 20 2007

Other

Other2007 ASABE Annual International Meeting, Technical Papers
CountryUnited States
CityMinneapolis, MN
Period6/17/076/20/07

Fingerprint

economic analysis
Cost-Benefit Analysis
engineering
Ethanol
ethanol
Zea mays
Economics
Fibers
corn
Feedstocks
Sensitivity analysis
feedstocks
Proteins
protein content
wet milling
Economic Models
Economic analysis
econometric models
Fermentation
pericarp

Keywords

  • Bioenergy
  • Dry grind process
  • Engineering economic model
  • Ethanol
  • Quick germ quick fiber process

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)
  • Engineering(all)

Cite this

Li, C., Rodriguez, L. F., Khanna, M., Spaulding, A. D., & Eckhoff, S. R. (2007). An engineering economic evaluation of quick germ quick fiber process for dry-grind ethanol facilities. Paper presented at 2007 ASABE Annual International Meeting, Technical Papers, Minneapolis, MN, United States.

An engineering economic evaluation of quick germ quick fiber process for dry-grind ethanol facilities. / Li, Changying; Rodriguez, Luis F; Khanna, Madhu; Spaulding, Aslihan D.; Eckhoff, Steven R.

2007. Paper presented at 2007 ASABE Annual International Meeting, Technical Papers, Minneapolis, MN, United States.

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

Li, C, Rodriguez, LF, Khanna, M, Spaulding, AD & Eckhoff, SR 2007, 'An engineering economic evaluation of quick germ quick fiber process for dry-grind ethanol facilities' Paper presented at 2007 ASABE Annual International Meeting, Technical Papers, Minneapolis, MN, United States, 6/17/07 - 6/20/07, .
Li C, Rodriguez LF, Khanna M, Spaulding AD, Eckhoff SR. An engineering economic evaluation of quick germ quick fiber process for dry-grind ethanol facilities. 2007. Paper presented at 2007 ASABE Annual International Meeting, Technical Papers, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Li, Changying ; Rodriguez, Luis F ; Khanna, Madhu ; Spaulding, Aslihan D. ; Eckhoff, Steven R. / An engineering economic evaluation of quick germ quick fiber process for dry-grind ethanol facilities. Paper presented at 2007 ASABE Annual International Meeting, Technical Papers, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
@conference{5265876c69ff40c8b109915c851f7f28,
title = "An engineering economic evaluation of quick germ quick fiber process for dry-grind ethanol facilities",
abstract = "An engineering economic model which is mass balance and compositionally driven was developed to compare the conventional corn dry-grind process and the preseparation process called {"}Quick Germ/Quick Fiber{"} (QQ). The QQ process combines a wet milling front end with a dry-grind back end to recover the germ and coarse fiber (pericarp) before fermentation. In this model, the DDGS price was linked with its protein and fiber content as well as with the long term average relationship between DDGS, soybean meal, and corn prices. The detailed economic analysis showed that the payback time for the QQ plant retrofitted from conventional dry grind ethanol plant is only 1.01 years and the QQ process reduces the manufacturing cost of ethanol by 18.6 φ/gal. Sensitivity analysis was also conducted to compare retrofitted plant and conventional dry-grind plant overall revenue at different corn price, ethanol price, and corn compositions. Ethanol and feedstock price sensitivity analysis showed the QQ plant gains more profits when ethanol price increases, and are less sensitive to feedstock price change than conventional dry-grind ethanol plant. The payback time for the QQ process also varies depending on protein content in corn.",
keywords = "Bioenergy, Dry grind process, Engineering economic model, Ethanol, Quick germ quick fiber process",
author = "Changying Li and Rodriguez, {Luis F} and Madhu Khanna and Spaulding, {Aslihan D.} and Eckhoff, {Steven R.}",
year = "2007",
month = "11",
day = "7",
language = "English (US)",
note = "2007 ASABE Annual International Meeting, Technical Papers ; Conference date: 17-06-2007 Through 20-06-2007",

}

TY - CONF

T1 - An engineering economic evaluation of quick germ quick fiber process for dry-grind ethanol facilities

AU - Li, Changying

AU - Rodriguez, Luis F

AU - Khanna, Madhu

AU - Spaulding, Aslihan D.

AU - Eckhoff, Steven R.

PY - 2007/11/7

Y1 - 2007/11/7

N2 - An engineering economic model which is mass balance and compositionally driven was developed to compare the conventional corn dry-grind process and the preseparation process called "Quick Germ/Quick Fiber" (QQ). The QQ process combines a wet milling front end with a dry-grind back end to recover the germ and coarse fiber (pericarp) before fermentation. In this model, the DDGS price was linked with its protein and fiber content as well as with the long term average relationship between DDGS, soybean meal, and corn prices. The detailed economic analysis showed that the payback time for the QQ plant retrofitted from conventional dry grind ethanol plant is only 1.01 years and the QQ process reduces the manufacturing cost of ethanol by 18.6 φ/gal. Sensitivity analysis was also conducted to compare retrofitted plant and conventional dry-grind plant overall revenue at different corn price, ethanol price, and corn compositions. Ethanol and feedstock price sensitivity analysis showed the QQ plant gains more profits when ethanol price increases, and are less sensitive to feedstock price change than conventional dry-grind ethanol plant. The payback time for the QQ process also varies depending on protein content in corn.

AB - An engineering economic model which is mass balance and compositionally driven was developed to compare the conventional corn dry-grind process and the preseparation process called "Quick Germ/Quick Fiber" (QQ). The QQ process combines a wet milling front end with a dry-grind back end to recover the germ and coarse fiber (pericarp) before fermentation. In this model, the DDGS price was linked with its protein and fiber content as well as with the long term average relationship between DDGS, soybean meal, and corn prices. The detailed economic analysis showed that the payback time for the QQ plant retrofitted from conventional dry grind ethanol plant is only 1.01 years and the QQ process reduces the manufacturing cost of ethanol by 18.6 φ/gal. Sensitivity analysis was also conducted to compare retrofitted plant and conventional dry-grind plant overall revenue at different corn price, ethanol price, and corn compositions. Ethanol and feedstock price sensitivity analysis showed the QQ plant gains more profits when ethanol price increases, and are less sensitive to feedstock price change than conventional dry-grind ethanol plant. The payback time for the QQ process also varies depending on protein content in corn.

KW - Bioenergy

KW - Dry grind process

KW - Engineering economic model

KW - Ethanol

KW - Quick germ quick fiber process

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=35648996046&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=35648996046&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Paper

ER -