An empirical comparison of the area methods, lord's chi-square test, and the mantel-haenszel technique for assessing differential item functioning

Nambury S. Raju, Fritz Drasgow, Jeffrey A. Slinde

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Data from a 45-item vocabulary test (tryout edition) were used to assess the degree of congruence between the signed area measure, the unsigned area measure, Lord's chi-square statistic, and the Mantel-Haenszel (MH) technique in identifying items with significant differential item functioning (DIF). In both the Black-White and Female-Male comparisons, the three methods based on item response theory (IRT) identified the same items as having statistically significant DIF. There was close agreement between the MH technique and the three IRT-based procedures only in the Female-Male comparison; different items were identified as biased in the Black-White comparison.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)301-314
Number of pages14
JournalEducational and Psychological Measurement
Volume53
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1993

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Applied Psychology
  • Applied Mathematics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'An empirical comparison of the area methods, lord's chi-square test, and the mantel-haenszel technique for assessing differential item functioning'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this