Alternative student-based revenue streams for higher education institutions

A difference-in-difference analysis using guaranteed tuition policies

Jennifer A Delaney, Tyler D. Kearney

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This study considered the impact of state-level guaranteed tuition programs on alternative student-based revenue streams. It used a quasi-experimental, difference-in-difference methodology with a panel dataset of public four-year institutions from 2000-2012. Illinois’ 2004 “Truth-in-Tuition” law was used as the policy of interest and the treatment condition. Following the introduction of Illinois’ guaranteed tuition law, required fees and out-of-state tuition increased significantly at institutions subject to the law, but not the number or percent of out-of-state students. These results were robust to specifications with alternative comparison groups and the inclusion of state-specific linear time trends.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)731-769
Number of pages39
JournalJournal of Higher Education
Volume87
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2016

Fingerprint

revenue
Law
education
student
fee
inclusion
methodology
trend
Group
time

Keywords

  • Difference-in-difference
  • Fees
  • Higher education
  • Out-of-state enrolment
  • Quasi-experimental
  • Tuition

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Cite this

@article{ee8b1d9c9af343c3b9e5b316ca93e3dd,
title = "Alternative student-based revenue streams for higher education institutions: A difference-in-difference analysis using guaranteed tuition policies",
abstract = "This study considered the impact of state-level guaranteed tuition programs on alternative student-based revenue streams. It used a quasi-experimental, difference-in-difference methodology with a panel dataset of public four-year institutions from 2000-2012. Illinois’ 2004 “Truth-in-Tuition” law was used as the policy of interest and the treatment condition. Following the introduction of Illinois’ guaranteed tuition law, required fees and out-of-state tuition increased significantly at institutions subject to the law, but not the number or percent of out-of-state students. These results were robust to specifications with alternative comparison groups and the inclusion of state-specific linear time trends.",
keywords = "Difference-in-difference, Fees, Higher education, Out-of-state enrolment, Quasi-experimental, Tuition",
author = "Delaney, {Jennifer A} and Kearney, {Tyler D.}",
year = "2016",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1353/jhe.2016.0028",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "87",
pages = "731--769",
journal = "Journal of Higher Education",
issn = "0022-1546",
publisher = "Ohio State University Press",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Alternative student-based revenue streams for higher education institutions

T2 - A difference-in-difference analysis using guaranteed tuition policies

AU - Delaney, Jennifer A

AU - Kearney, Tyler D.

PY - 2016/9/1

Y1 - 2016/9/1

N2 - This study considered the impact of state-level guaranteed tuition programs on alternative student-based revenue streams. It used a quasi-experimental, difference-in-difference methodology with a panel dataset of public four-year institutions from 2000-2012. Illinois’ 2004 “Truth-in-Tuition” law was used as the policy of interest and the treatment condition. Following the introduction of Illinois’ guaranteed tuition law, required fees and out-of-state tuition increased significantly at institutions subject to the law, but not the number or percent of out-of-state students. These results were robust to specifications with alternative comparison groups and the inclusion of state-specific linear time trends.

AB - This study considered the impact of state-level guaranteed tuition programs on alternative student-based revenue streams. It used a quasi-experimental, difference-in-difference methodology with a panel dataset of public four-year institutions from 2000-2012. Illinois’ 2004 “Truth-in-Tuition” law was used as the policy of interest and the treatment condition. Following the introduction of Illinois’ guaranteed tuition law, required fees and out-of-state tuition increased significantly at institutions subject to the law, but not the number or percent of out-of-state students. These results were robust to specifications with alternative comparison groups and the inclusion of state-specific linear time trends.

KW - Difference-in-difference

KW - Fees

KW - Higher education

KW - Out-of-state enrolment

KW - Quasi-experimental

KW - Tuition

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84984794877&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84984794877&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1353/jhe.2016.0028

DO - 10.1353/jhe.2016.0028

M3 - Article

VL - 87

SP - 731

EP - 769

JO - Journal of Higher Education

JF - Journal of Higher Education

SN - 0022-1546

IS - 5

ER -