Ahemeral light-dark cycles and intermittent photoperiod effects on laying hens.

Kenneth W Koelkebeck, H. V. Biellier

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

To compare the effects of using continuous (C) vs. intermittent (I) photoperiods with normal (24 hr) and a long but decreasing light-dark cycle (LDLDC) on production performance and egg quality, 240 White Leghorn hens of the University of Missouri-Columbia strain were individually caged in light-controlled rooms. Treatments applied at 21 weeks of age were light-dark cycles (LDC) of 25 hr gradually reduced to 23.5 hr with C or I photoperiods, and 24-hr LDC (controls); C or I photoperiods were gradually increased from 13.75 to 16 hr for the 25- to 23.5-hr LDC, and from 13.75 to 15 hr for the 24-hr LDC. Data were obtained on hen-day egg production, egg weight, egg mass, egg specific gravity, Haugh units, feed consumption, and feed efficiency. Hen-day egg production was significantly greater (P less than .01) for the combined C photoperiod treatments, while hens consumed significantly less (P less than .05) feed exposed to the combined I photoperiod treatments. Egg specific gravity was significantly better (P less than .05) for the LDLDC vs. the 24-hr LDC program with the difference being attributed to an increase (P less than .05) in initial egg specific gravity with the use of a 24-hr LDC. Egg weight, egg mass, Haugh units, and feed efficiency were not affected (P greater than .05) by LDC or photoperiod treatments.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2002-2007
Number of pages6
JournalPoultry science
Volume65
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1986
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

laying hens
photoperiod
egg weight
hens
specific gravity
egg production
feed conversion
White Leghorn
egg quality
feed intake

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Animal Science and Zoology

Cite this

Ahemeral light-dark cycles and intermittent photoperiod effects on laying hens. / Koelkebeck, Kenneth W; Biellier, H. V.

In: Poultry science, Vol. 65, No. 11, 11.1986, p. 2002-2007.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{410c6515dd3c40d9a693fbb913f0aef5,
title = "Ahemeral light-dark cycles and intermittent photoperiod effects on laying hens.",
abstract = "To compare the effects of using continuous (C) vs. intermittent (I) photoperiods with normal (24 hr) and a long but decreasing light-dark cycle (LDLDC) on production performance and egg quality, 240 White Leghorn hens of the University of Missouri-Columbia strain were individually caged in light-controlled rooms. Treatments applied at 21 weeks of age were light-dark cycles (LDC) of 25 hr gradually reduced to 23.5 hr with C or I photoperiods, and 24-hr LDC (controls); C or I photoperiods were gradually increased from 13.75 to 16 hr for the 25- to 23.5-hr LDC, and from 13.75 to 15 hr for the 24-hr LDC. Data were obtained on hen-day egg production, egg weight, egg mass, egg specific gravity, Haugh units, feed consumption, and feed efficiency. Hen-day egg production was significantly greater (P less than .01) for the combined C photoperiod treatments, while hens consumed significantly less (P less than .05) feed exposed to the combined I photoperiod treatments. Egg specific gravity was significantly better (P less than .05) for the LDLDC vs. the 24-hr LDC program with the difference being attributed to an increase (P less than .05) in initial egg specific gravity with the use of a 24-hr LDC. Egg weight, egg mass, Haugh units, and feed efficiency were not affected (P greater than .05) by LDC or photoperiod treatments.",
author = "Koelkebeck, {Kenneth W} and Biellier, {H. V.}",
year = "1986",
month = "11",
doi = "10.3382/ps.0652002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "65",
pages = "2002--2007",
journal = "Poultry Science",
issn = "0032-5791",
publisher = "Poultry Science Association",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ahemeral light-dark cycles and intermittent photoperiod effects on laying hens.

AU - Koelkebeck, Kenneth W

AU - Biellier, H. V.

PY - 1986/11

Y1 - 1986/11

N2 - To compare the effects of using continuous (C) vs. intermittent (I) photoperiods with normal (24 hr) and a long but decreasing light-dark cycle (LDLDC) on production performance and egg quality, 240 White Leghorn hens of the University of Missouri-Columbia strain were individually caged in light-controlled rooms. Treatments applied at 21 weeks of age were light-dark cycles (LDC) of 25 hr gradually reduced to 23.5 hr with C or I photoperiods, and 24-hr LDC (controls); C or I photoperiods were gradually increased from 13.75 to 16 hr for the 25- to 23.5-hr LDC, and from 13.75 to 15 hr for the 24-hr LDC. Data were obtained on hen-day egg production, egg weight, egg mass, egg specific gravity, Haugh units, feed consumption, and feed efficiency. Hen-day egg production was significantly greater (P less than .01) for the combined C photoperiod treatments, while hens consumed significantly less (P less than .05) feed exposed to the combined I photoperiod treatments. Egg specific gravity was significantly better (P less than .05) for the LDLDC vs. the 24-hr LDC program with the difference being attributed to an increase (P less than .05) in initial egg specific gravity with the use of a 24-hr LDC. Egg weight, egg mass, Haugh units, and feed efficiency were not affected (P greater than .05) by LDC or photoperiod treatments.

AB - To compare the effects of using continuous (C) vs. intermittent (I) photoperiods with normal (24 hr) and a long but decreasing light-dark cycle (LDLDC) on production performance and egg quality, 240 White Leghorn hens of the University of Missouri-Columbia strain were individually caged in light-controlled rooms. Treatments applied at 21 weeks of age were light-dark cycles (LDC) of 25 hr gradually reduced to 23.5 hr with C or I photoperiods, and 24-hr LDC (controls); C or I photoperiods were gradually increased from 13.75 to 16 hr for the 25- to 23.5-hr LDC, and from 13.75 to 15 hr for the 24-hr LDC. Data were obtained on hen-day egg production, egg weight, egg mass, egg specific gravity, Haugh units, feed consumption, and feed efficiency. Hen-day egg production was significantly greater (P less than .01) for the combined C photoperiod treatments, while hens consumed significantly less (P less than .05) feed exposed to the combined I photoperiod treatments. Egg specific gravity was significantly better (P less than .05) for the LDLDC vs. the 24-hr LDC program with the difference being attributed to an increase (P less than .05) in initial egg specific gravity with the use of a 24-hr LDC. Egg weight, egg mass, Haugh units, and feed efficiency were not affected (P greater than .05) by LDC or photoperiod treatments.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0022817355&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0022817355&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3382/ps.0652002

DO - 10.3382/ps.0652002

M3 - Article

C2 - 3822978

AN - SCOPUS:0022817355

VL - 65

SP - 2002

EP - 2007

JO - Poultry Science

JF - Poultry Science

SN - 0032-5791

IS - 11

ER -