TY - JOUR
T1 - Age-related declines in early sensory memory
T2 - Identification of rapid auditory and visual stimulus sequences
AU - Fogerty, Daniel
AU - Humes, Larry E.
AU - Busey, Thomas A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Fogerty, Humes and Busey.
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - Age-related temporal-processing declines of rapidly presented sequences may involve contributions of sensory memory. This study investigated recall for rapidly presented auditory (vowel) and visual (letter) sequences presented at six different stimulus onset asynchronies (SOA) that spanned threshold SOAs for sequence identification. Younger, middle-aged, and older adults participated in all tasks. Results were investigated at both equivalent performance levels (i.e., SOA threshold) and at identical physical stimulus values (i.e., SOAs). For four-item sequences, results demonstrated best performance for the first and last items in the auditory sequences, but only the first item for visual sequences. For two-item sequences, adults identified the second vowel or letter significantly better than the first. Overall, when temporal-order performance was equated for each individual by testing at SOA thresholds, recall accuracy for each position across the age groups was highly similar. These results suggest that modality-specific processing declines of older adults primarily determine temporal-order performance for rapid sequences. However, there is some evidence for a second amodal processing decline in older adults related to early sensory memory for final items in a sequence. This selective deficit was observed particularly for longer sequence lengths and was not accounted for by temporal masking.
AB - Age-related temporal-processing declines of rapidly presented sequences may involve contributions of sensory memory. This study investigated recall for rapidly presented auditory (vowel) and visual (letter) sequences presented at six different stimulus onset asynchronies (SOA) that spanned threshold SOAs for sequence identification. Younger, middle-aged, and older adults participated in all tasks. Results were investigated at both equivalent performance levels (i.e., SOA threshold) and at identical physical stimulus values (i.e., SOAs). For four-item sequences, results demonstrated best performance for the first and last items in the auditory sequences, but only the first item for visual sequences. For two-item sequences, adults identified the second vowel or letter significantly better than the first. Overall, when temporal-order performance was equated for each individual by testing at SOA thresholds, recall accuracy for each position across the age groups was highly similar. These results suggest that modality-specific processing declines of older adults primarily determine temporal-order performance for rapid sequences. However, there is some evidence for a second amodal processing decline in older adults related to early sensory memory for final items in a sequence. This selective deficit was observed particularly for longer sequence lengths and was not accounted for by temporal masking.
KW - Aging
KW - Cognitive hearing science
KW - Psychophysics
KW - Sensory memory
KW - Temporal processing
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84974556087&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84974556087&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3389/fnagi.2016.00090
DO - 10.3389/fnagi.2016.00090
M3 - Article
C2 - 27199737
AN - SCOPUS:84974556087
SN - 1663-4365
VL - 8
JO - Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
JF - Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
IS - MAY
M1 - 90
ER -