Afterthoughts on Snyder v. Phelps

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

From a scholarly and professional perspective, the Supreme Court’s decision in Snyder v. Phelps added little to the development of free speech doctrine. As a normative matter, the Court’s role in the resolution of this case is hard to justify or explain.

In this short piece, we reflect on the normative costs of the Court’s decision and raise additional constitutional questions not addressed by the Court in its decision.
Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)43-45
Number of pages3
JournalCardozo Law Review de novo
Volume43
StatePublished - 2011

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Afterthoughts on Snyder v. Phelps'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this