TY - JOUR
T1 - African American family and parenting strategies in impoverished neighborhoods
AU - Jarrett, Robin L.
N1 - Funding Information:
This paper was funded by a Faculty Scholar Award from the William T. Grant Foundation, an NSF Award for the Study of Race, Urban Poverty, and Social Policy (Northwestern University), a grant from the Social
Funding Information:
Science Research Council's Program on the Urban Underclass, and a Visiting Scholar Award from the Russell Sage Foundation. Jeanne Brooks-Gunn, Geraldine Brookings, Linda Burton, P. Lindsay Chase-Lansdale, Thomas Cook, Greg Duncan, Martha Gephardt, Katherine Newman,Margaret Spencer, and members of the Social Science Research Council's Working Group on Communities and Neighborhoods, Family Processes and Individual Development made useful comments on an earlier draft of this paper. Deanne Orput and Robin Draper expertly assisted in the review of the qualitative studies and Denise Daniels skillfully assisted in preparation of the manuscript. Detailed comments from four anonymous reviewers helped in revising the article.
PY - 1997
Y1 - 1997
N2 - This article considers how qualitative insights can inform quantitatively-derived neighborhood effects theories. Neighborhood effects theories argue that inner-city areas lack social and economic resources that promote the social mobility prospects of African American children. Consequently, children who grow up in impoverished neighborhoods are at risk for dropping out of school, bearing children prematurely, and engaging in delinquent activities. Qualitative studies, however, identify family and parenting strategies that buffer children from the risks associated with inner-city residence. When these practices are used, children are more likely to complete high school, forego premature childbearing, and participate in prosocial activities. Insights from qualitative studies expand on neighborhood effects theories by identifying variations in child social mobility prospects and the processes by which conventional outcomes are achieved. More specifically, qualitative studies focus attention on important factors that permit children to succeed, despite social and economic obstacles.
AB - This article considers how qualitative insights can inform quantitatively-derived neighborhood effects theories. Neighborhood effects theories argue that inner-city areas lack social and economic resources that promote the social mobility prospects of African American children. Consequently, children who grow up in impoverished neighborhoods are at risk for dropping out of school, bearing children prematurely, and engaging in delinquent activities. Qualitative studies, however, identify family and parenting strategies that buffer children from the risks associated with inner-city residence. When these practices are used, children are more likely to complete high school, forego premature childbearing, and participate in prosocial activities. Insights from qualitative studies expand on neighborhood effects theories by identifying variations in child social mobility prospects and the processes by which conventional outcomes are achieved. More specifically, qualitative studies focus attention on important factors that permit children to succeed, despite social and economic obstacles.
KW - African american children
KW - African american families
KW - Qualitative research
KW - Underclass
KW - Urban ethnography
KW - Urban poverty
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0000102495&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0000102495&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1023/A%3A1024717803273
DO - 10.1023/A%3A1024717803273
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0000102495
SN - 0162-0436
VL - 20
SP - 275
EP - 288
JO - Qualitative Sociology
JF - Qualitative Sociology
IS - 2
ER -