TY - JOUR
T1 - Affective Polarization in Political and Nonpolitical Settings
AU - Rudolph, Thomas J.
AU - Hetherington, Marc J.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The World Association for Public Opinion Research. All rights reserved.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - We seek to understand the extent to which affective polarization is driven by in-group love or out-group hate and whether it varies across context. The answer may, in turn, allow us to evaluate how well the fundamental premises of social identity theory mesh with different manifestations of affective polarization. Using an experiment to analyze partisans' trust judgments, we find that the amount of affective polarization and the dominant mechanism underlying it varies by context - whether political or nonpolitical. We find that affective polarization is nearly twice as strong in political settings as in nonpolitical settings. In addition, although affective polarization reflects a blend of both in-party love and out-party hate in both contexts, we find that in-party love is the more dominant source of polarization in nonpolitical settings while out-party hate is the more dominant source in political settings. The latter finding causes us to question how well-suited social identity theory is for understanding polarization in the political sphere.
AB - We seek to understand the extent to which affective polarization is driven by in-group love or out-group hate and whether it varies across context. The answer may, in turn, allow us to evaluate how well the fundamental premises of social identity theory mesh with different manifestations of affective polarization. Using an experiment to analyze partisans' trust judgments, we find that the amount of affective polarization and the dominant mechanism underlying it varies by context - whether political or nonpolitical. We find that affective polarization is nearly twice as strong in political settings as in nonpolitical settings. In addition, although affective polarization reflects a blend of both in-party love and out-party hate in both contexts, we find that in-party love is the more dominant source of polarization in nonpolitical settings while out-party hate is the more dominant source in political settings. The latter finding causes us to question how well-suited social identity theory is for understanding polarization in the political sphere.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85119524897&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85119524897&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/ijpor/edaa040
DO - 10.1093/ijpor/edaa040
M3 - Article
SN - 0954-2892
VL - 33
SP - 591
EP - 606
JO - International Journal of Public Opinion Research
JF - International Journal of Public Opinion Research
IS - 3
M1 - edaa040
ER -