Adverse health outcomes among cosmetologists and noncosmetologists in the reproductive outcomes of salon employees (rose) study

Lisa Gallicchio, Susan R. Miller, Teresa Greene, Howard Zacur, Jodi A Flaws

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine adverse health outcomes, including those related to cardiovascular and skin health as well as respiratory functions, among cosmetologists aged 21 to 55 yr and to compare data to women of the same age working in other occupations. Self-reported data were analyzed from 450 cosmetologists and 511 women in other occupations who participated in the Reproductive Outcomes of Salon Employees (ROSE) study in Maryland. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were computed using logistic regression to examine the associations between cosmetologist occupation and each adverse health outcome adjusted for age, education, and smoking status. Cosmetologists were at significantly increased risk of depression compared to noncosmetologists after adjustment for age, education, and smoking status (OR 1.49; 95% CI 1.10, 2.00). There were no statistically significant associations between cosmetology occupation and the other adverse health outcomes, including those related to allergies and skin disorders, in both the unadjusted and adjusted analyses. Cosmetologists may be exposed to chemicals in the salon that lead to depression. Future study needs to be conducted to examine specific chemical exposures in the salon. This will help to provide information required for the development of best occupational safety practices among salon workers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)52-61
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Toxicology and Environmental Health - Part A: Current Issues
Volume74
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2011

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Toxicology
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Adverse health outcomes among cosmetologists and noncosmetologists in the reproductive outcomes of salon employees (rose) study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this