Adverse health in parents of children with disabilities and chronic health conditions: A meta-analysis using the Parenting Stress Index's Health Sub-domain

N. Miodrag, Meghan Maureen Burke, E. Tanner-Smith, R. M. Hodapp

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Compared with parents of same-aged children without disabilities, parents of children with disabilities and with chronic health conditions (CHC) show higher levels of stress and depression. Fewer studies, however, examine the physical health of these parents, and studies report mixed findings. Many studies, however, report mother's self-reported health using the Health Sub-domain of Abidin's Parenting Stress Index (PSI). We therefore conducted a meta-analysis comparing the physical health of parents of children with developmental disabilities (DD) and CHC vs. parents of children without DD/CHC in studies utilising this measure. Methods: Eligible studies used the long form of the PSI and reported results from the 5-item Health sub-domain. Group comparison effect sizes were synthesised in a meta-analysis, and we also examined the potential relations of child, parent, and study characteristics. Our search yielded 19 eligible studies. Results: Compared with parents of children without DD/CHC, parents of children with DD/CHC reported higher PSI health problem scores, with a weighted mean effect size of 0.39 (95% CI=0.23-0.55). Effect sizes ranged from -0.13 to 1.46 and there was evidence of heterogeneity in the effect sizes (τ2=0.07; Q18=48.64, P<0.01; I2=63.0%). Studies with higher numbers of reporting quality indicators generally reported larger effects and more recent studies showed smaller effects. Although several child and parent characteristics were moderately associated with effect sizes, none reached statistical significance. Conclusions: Practitioners should be alerted to the need for health prevention and treatment in this at-risk parent group.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)257-271
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Intellectual Disability Research
Volume59
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Disabled Children
Parenting
Meta-Analysis
Parents
Health
Developmental Disabilities
Meta-analysis
Parent-Child Relations
Self Report
Effect Size
Mothers
Depression

Keywords

  • Carers
  • Intellectual disability
  • Methodology in research
  • Parents

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Neurology
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

@article{5e496b0b2eb14c2ab01ae0d9b063d204,
title = "Adverse health in parents of children with disabilities and chronic health conditions: A meta-analysis using the Parenting Stress Index's Health Sub-domain",
abstract = "Background: Compared with parents of same-aged children without disabilities, parents of children with disabilities and with chronic health conditions (CHC) show higher levels of stress and depression. Fewer studies, however, examine the physical health of these parents, and studies report mixed findings. Many studies, however, report mother's self-reported health using the Health Sub-domain of Abidin's Parenting Stress Index (PSI). We therefore conducted a meta-analysis comparing the physical health of parents of children with developmental disabilities (DD) and CHC vs. parents of children without DD/CHC in studies utilising this measure. Methods: Eligible studies used the long form of the PSI and reported results from the 5-item Health sub-domain. Group comparison effect sizes were synthesised in a meta-analysis, and we also examined the potential relations of child, parent, and study characteristics. Our search yielded 19 eligible studies. Results: Compared with parents of children without DD/CHC, parents of children with DD/CHC reported higher PSI health problem scores, with a weighted mean effect size of 0.39 (95{\%} CI=0.23-0.55). Effect sizes ranged from -0.13 to 1.46 and there was evidence of heterogeneity in the effect sizes (τ2=0.07; Q18=48.64, P<0.01; I2=63.0{\%}). Studies with higher numbers of reporting quality indicators generally reported larger effects and more recent studies showed smaller effects. Although several child and parent characteristics were moderately associated with effect sizes, none reached statistical significance. Conclusions: Practitioners should be alerted to the need for health prevention and treatment in this at-risk parent group.",
keywords = "Carers, Intellectual disability, Methodology in research, Parents",
author = "N. Miodrag and Burke, {Meghan Maureen} and E. Tanner-Smith and Hodapp, {R. M.}",
year = "2015",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/jir.12135",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "59",
pages = "257--271",
journal = "Journal of Intellectual Disability Research",
issn = "0964-2633",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Adverse health in parents of children with disabilities and chronic health conditions

T2 - A meta-analysis using the Parenting Stress Index's Health Sub-domain

AU - Miodrag, N.

AU - Burke, Meghan Maureen

AU - Tanner-Smith, E.

AU - Hodapp, R. M.

PY - 2015/3/1

Y1 - 2015/3/1

N2 - Background: Compared with parents of same-aged children without disabilities, parents of children with disabilities and with chronic health conditions (CHC) show higher levels of stress and depression. Fewer studies, however, examine the physical health of these parents, and studies report mixed findings. Many studies, however, report mother's self-reported health using the Health Sub-domain of Abidin's Parenting Stress Index (PSI). We therefore conducted a meta-analysis comparing the physical health of parents of children with developmental disabilities (DD) and CHC vs. parents of children without DD/CHC in studies utilising this measure. Methods: Eligible studies used the long form of the PSI and reported results from the 5-item Health sub-domain. Group comparison effect sizes were synthesised in a meta-analysis, and we also examined the potential relations of child, parent, and study characteristics. Our search yielded 19 eligible studies. Results: Compared with parents of children without DD/CHC, parents of children with DD/CHC reported higher PSI health problem scores, with a weighted mean effect size of 0.39 (95% CI=0.23-0.55). Effect sizes ranged from -0.13 to 1.46 and there was evidence of heterogeneity in the effect sizes (τ2=0.07; Q18=48.64, P<0.01; I2=63.0%). Studies with higher numbers of reporting quality indicators generally reported larger effects and more recent studies showed smaller effects. Although several child and parent characteristics were moderately associated with effect sizes, none reached statistical significance. Conclusions: Practitioners should be alerted to the need for health prevention and treatment in this at-risk parent group.

AB - Background: Compared with parents of same-aged children without disabilities, parents of children with disabilities and with chronic health conditions (CHC) show higher levels of stress and depression. Fewer studies, however, examine the physical health of these parents, and studies report mixed findings. Many studies, however, report mother's self-reported health using the Health Sub-domain of Abidin's Parenting Stress Index (PSI). We therefore conducted a meta-analysis comparing the physical health of parents of children with developmental disabilities (DD) and CHC vs. parents of children without DD/CHC in studies utilising this measure. Methods: Eligible studies used the long form of the PSI and reported results from the 5-item Health sub-domain. Group comparison effect sizes were synthesised in a meta-analysis, and we also examined the potential relations of child, parent, and study characteristics. Our search yielded 19 eligible studies. Results: Compared with parents of children without DD/CHC, parents of children with DD/CHC reported higher PSI health problem scores, with a weighted mean effect size of 0.39 (95% CI=0.23-0.55). Effect sizes ranged from -0.13 to 1.46 and there was evidence of heterogeneity in the effect sizes (τ2=0.07; Q18=48.64, P<0.01; I2=63.0%). Studies with higher numbers of reporting quality indicators generally reported larger effects and more recent studies showed smaller effects. Although several child and parent characteristics were moderately associated with effect sizes, none reached statistical significance. Conclusions: Practitioners should be alerted to the need for health prevention and treatment in this at-risk parent group.

KW - Carers

KW - Intellectual disability

KW - Methodology in research

KW - Parents

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84921603271&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84921603271&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/jir.12135

DO - 10.1111/jir.12135

M3 - Article

C2 - 24762325

AN - SCOPUS:84921603271

VL - 59

SP - 257

EP - 271

JO - Journal of Intellectual Disability Research

JF - Journal of Intellectual Disability Research

SN - 0964-2633

IS - 3

ER -