Advances in the identification and evaluation of complex environmental systems models

Thorsten Wagener, Patrick Reed, Kathryn Van Werkhoven, Yong Tang, Zhenxing Zhang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Advances in our ability to model complex environmental systems are currently driven by at least four needs: (1) the need for the inclusion of uncertainty in monitoring, modelling and decisionmaking; (2) the need to provide environmental predictions everywhere; (3) the need to predict the impacts of environmental change; and (4) the need to adaptively evolve observation networks to better resolve environmental systems and embrace sensing innovations. Satisfying these needs will require improved theory, improved models and improved frameworks for making and evaluating predictions. All of these improvements should result in the long-term evolution and improvement of observation systems. In the context of this paper we discuss current bottlenecks and opportunities for advancing environmental modelling with and without local observations of system response. More realistic representations of real-world thresholds, nonlinearities and feedbacks motivates the use of more complex models as well as the consequent need for more rigorous evaluations of model performance. In the case of gauged systems, we find that global sensitivity analysis provides a widely underused tool for evaluating models' assumptions and estimating the information content of data, in the case of ungauged systems, including the modelling of environmental change impacts, we propose that the definition of constraints on the expected system response provides a promising way forward. Examples of our own work are included to support the conclusions of this discussion paper. Overall, we conclude that an important bottleneck currently limiting environmental predictions lies in how our model evaluation and identification approaches are extracting, using and evolving the information available for environmental systems at the watershed scale.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)266-281
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Hydroinformatics
Volume11
Issue number3-4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Identification (control systems)
environmental change
prediction
environmental modeling
Long Term Evolution (LTE)
Watersheds
nonlinearity
Sensitivity analysis
modeling
sensitivity analysis
evaluation
innovation
Innovation
watershed
Feedback
need
Monitoring
monitoring

Keywords

  • Climate change
  • Model diagnostics
  • Multi-objective optimization
  • Predictions in ungauged basins
  • Sensitivity analysis
  • Uncertainty analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Water Science and Technology
  • Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology
  • Atmospheric Science

Cite this

Advances in the identification and evaluation of complex environmental systems models. / Wagener, Thorsten; Reed, Patrick; Van Werkhoven, Kathryn; Tang, Yong; Zhang, Zhenxing.

In: Journal of Hydroinformatics, Vol. 11, No. 3-4, 07.2009, p. 266-281.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wagener, Thorsten ; Reed, Patrick ; Van Werkhoven, Kathryn ; Tang, Yong ; Zhang, Zhenxing. / Advances in the identification and evaluation of complex environmental systems models. In: Journal of Hydroinformatics. 2009 ; Vol. 11, No. 3-4. pp. 266-281.
@article{249f552cd7054b76800b991a7503d5ce,
title = "Advances in the identification and evaluation of complex environmental systems models",
abstract = "Advances in our ability to model complex environmental systems are currently driven by at least four needs: (1) the need for the inclusion of uncertainty in monitoring, modelling and decisionmaking; (2) the need to provide environmental predictions everywhere; (3) the need to predict the impacts of environmental change; and (4) the need to adaptively evolve observation networks to better resolve environmental systems and embrace sensing innovations. Satisfying these needs will require improved theory, improved models and improved frameworks for making and evaluating predictions. All of these improvements should result in the long-term evolution and improvement of observation systems. In the context of this paper we discuss current bottlenecks and opportunities for advancing environmental modelling with and without local observations of system response. More realistic representations of real-world thresholds, nonlinearities and feedbacks motivates the use of more complex models as well as the consequent need for more rigorous evaluations of model performance. In the case of gauged systems, we find that global sensitivity analysis provides a widely underused tool for evaluating models' assumptions and estimating the information content of data, in the case of ungauged systems, including the modelling of environmental change impacts, we propose that the definition of constraints on the expected system response provides a promising way forward. Examples of our own work are included to support the conclusions of this discussion paper. Overall, we conclude that an important bottleneck currently limiting environmental predictions lies in how our model evaluation and identification approaches are extracting, using and evolving the information available for environmental systems at the watershed scale.",
keywords = "Climate change, Model diagnostics, Multi-objective optimization, Predictions in ungauged basins, Sensitivity analysis, Uncertainty analysis",
author = "Thorsten Wagener and Patrick Reed and {Van Werkhoven}, Kathryn and Yong Tang and Zhenxing Zhang",
year = "2009",
month = "7",
doi = "10.2166/hydro.2009.040",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
pages = "266--281",
journal = "Journal of Hydroinformatics",
issn = "1464-7141",
publisher = "IWA Publishing",
number = "3-4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Advances in the identification and evaluation of complex environmental systems models

AU - Wagener, Thorsten

AU - Reed, Patrick

AU - Van Werkhoven, Kathryn

AU - Tang, Yong

AU - Zhang, Zhenxing

PY - 2009/7

Y1 - 2009/7

N2 - Advances in our ability to model complex environmental systems are currently driven by at least four needs: (1) the need for the inclusion of uncertainty in monitoring, modelling and decisionmaking; (2) the need to provide environmental predictions everywhere; (3) the need to predict the impacts of environmental change; and (4) the need to adaptively evolve observation networks to better resolve environmental systems and embrace sensing innovations. Satisfying these needs will require improved theory, improved models and improved frameworks for making and evaluating predictions. All of these improvements should result in the long-term evolution and improvement of observation systems. In the context of this paper we discuss current bottlenecks and opportunities for advancing environmental modelling with and without local observations of system response. More realistic representations of real-world thresholds, nonlinearities and feedbacks motivates the use of more complex models as well as the consequent need for more rigorous evaluations of model performance. In the case of gauged systems, we find that global sensitivity analysis provides a widely underused tool for evaluating models' assumptions and estimating the information content of data, in the case of ungauged systems, including the modelling of environmental change impacts, we propose that the definition of constraints on the expected system response provides a promising way forward. Examples of our own work are included to support the conclusions of this discussion paper. Overall, we conclude that an important bottleneck currently limiting environmental predictions lies in how our model evaluation and identification approaches are extracting, using and evolving the information available for environmental systems at the watershed scale.

AB - Advances in our ability to model complex environmental systems are currently driven by at least four needs: (1) the need for the inclusion of uncertainty in monitoring, modelling and decisionmaking; (2) the need to provide environmental predictions everywhere; (3) the need to predict the impacts of environmental change; and (4) the need to adaptively evolve observation networks to better resolve environmental systems and embrace sensing innovations. Satisfying these needs will require improved theory, improved models and improved frameworks for making and evaluating predictions. All of these improvements should result in the long-term evolution and improvement of observation systems. In the context of this paper we discuss current bottlenecks and opportunities for advancing environmental modelling with and without local observations of system response. More realistic representations of real-world thresholds, nonlinearities and feedbacks motivates the use of more complex models as well as the consequent need for more rigorous evaluations of model performance. In the case of gauged systems, we find that global sensitivity analysis provides a widely underused tool for evaluating models' assumptions and estimating the information content of data, in the case of ungauged systems, including the modelling of environmental change impacts, we propose that the definition of constraints on the expected system response provides a promising way forward. Examples of our own work are included to support the conclusions of this discussion paper. Overall, we conclude that an important bottleneck currently limiting environmental predictions lies in how our model evaluation and identification approaches are extracting, using and evolving the information available for environmental systems at the watershed scale.

KW - Climate change

KW - Model diagnostics

KW - Multi-objective optimization

KW - Predictions in ungauged basins

KW - Sensitivity analysis

KW - Uncertainty analysis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=68949113854&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=68949113854&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2166/hydro.2009.040

DO - 10.2166/hydro.2009.040

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:68949113854

VL - 11

SP - 266

EP - 281

JO - Journal of Hydroinformatics

JF - Journal of Hydroinformatics

SN - 1464-7141

IS - 3-4

ER -