Adopting bioenergy crops: Does farmers’ attitude toward loss matter?

Mohit Anand, Ruiqing Miao, Madhu Khanna

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

We apply prospect theory to examining farmers’ economic incentives to divert a share of their land to bioenergy crops (miscanthus and switchgrass in this study). Numerical simulation is conducted for 1,919 rain-fed U.S. counties to identify the impact of loss aversion on bioenergy crop adoption, and how this impact is influenced by biomass price, discount rate, credit constraint status, and policy instruments. Results show that ignoring farmer's loss aversion causes overestimation of miscanthus production but underestimation of switchgrass production, particularly when farmers are credit constrained and have a high discount rate. We find that establishment cost subsidy induces more miscanthus production whereas subsidized energy crop insurance induces more switchgrass production. The efficacy of these two policy instruments, measured by biomass production increased by per dollar of government outlay, depends on the magnitude of farmers’ loss aversion and discount rate.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)435-450
Number of pages16
JournalAgricultural Economics (United Kingdom)
Volume50
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2019

Fingerprint

farmers' attitudes
energy crops
Miscanthus
Panicum virgatum
farmers
credit
crop insurance
economic incentives
subsidies
biomass production
rain
Crops
Bioenergy
Farmers
biomass
Discount rate
Loss aversion

Keywords

  • D81
  • Q15
  • Q16
  • bioenergy crops
  • crop insurance
  • establishment cost
  • loss aversion
  • miscanthus
  • prospect theory
  • switchgrass

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agronomy and Crop Science
  • Economics and Econometrics

Cite this

Adopting bioenergy crops : Does farmers’ attitude toward loss matter? / Anand, Mohit; Miao, Ruiqing; Khanna, Madhu.

In: Agricultural Economics (United Kingdom), Vol. 50, No. 4, 07.2019, p. 435-450.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{65049c8b37654482840f1316266a77c6,
title = "Adopting bioenergy crops: Does farmers’ attitude toward loss matter?",
abstract = "We apply prospect theory to examining farmers’ economic incentives to divert a share of their land to bioenergy crops (miscanthus and switchgrass in this study). Numerical simulation is conducted for 1,919 rain-fed U.S. counties to identify the impact of loss aversion on bioenergy crop adoption, and how this impact is influenced by biomass price, discount rate, credit constraint status, and policy instruments. Results show that ignoring farmer's loss aversion causes overestimation of miscanthus production but underestimation of switchgrass production, particularly when farmers are credit constrained and have a high discount rate. We find that establishment cost subsidy induces more miscanthus production whereas subsidized energy crop insurance induces more switchgrass production. The efficacy of these two policy instruments, measured by biomass production increased by per dollar of government outlay, depends on the magnitude of farmers’ loss aversion and discount rate.",
keywords = "D81, Q15, Q16, bioenergy crops, crop insurance, establishment cost, loss aversion, miscanthus, prospect theory, switchgrass",
author = "Mohit Anand and Ruiqing Miao and Madhu Khanna",
year = "2019",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1111/agec.12501",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "50",
pages = "435--450",
journal = "Agricultural Economics",
issn = "0169-5150",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Adopting bioenergy crops

T2 - Does farmers’ attitude toward loss matter?

AU - Anand, Mohit

AU - Miao, Ruiqing

AU - Khanna, Madhu

PY - 2019/7

Y1 - 2019/7

N2 - We apply prospect theory to examining farmers’ economic incentives to divert a share of their land to bioenergy crops (miscanthus and switchgrass in this study). Numerical simulation is conducted for 1,919 rain-fed U.S. counties to identify the impact of loss aversion on bioenergy crop adoption, and how this impact is influenced by biomass price, discount rate, credit constraint status, and policy instruments. Results show that ignoring farmer's loss aversion causes overestimation of miscanthus production but underestimation of switchgrass production, particularly when farmers are credit constrained and have a high discount rate. We find that establishment cost subsidy induces more miscanthus production whereas subsidized energy crop insurance induces more switchgrass production. The efficacy of these two policy instruments, measured by biomass production increased by per dollar of government outlay, depends on the magnitude of farmers’ loss aversion and discount rate.

AB - We apply prospect theory to examining farmers’ economic incentives to divert a share of their land to bioenergy crops (miscanthus and switchgrass in this study). Numerical simulation is conducted for 1,919 rain-fed U.S. counties to identify the impact of loss aversion on bioenergy crop adoption, and how this impact is influenced by biomass price, discount rate, credit constraint status, and policy instruments. Results show that ignoring farmer's loss aversion causes overestimation of miscanthus production but underestimation of switchgrass production, particularly when farmers are credit constrained and have a high discount rate. We find that establishment cost subsidy induces more miscanthus production whereas subsidized energy crop insurance induces more switchgrass production. The efficacy of these two policy instruments, measured by biomass production increased by per dollar of government outlay, depends on the magnitude of farmers’ loss aversion and discount rate.

KW - D81

KW - Q15

KW - Q16

KW - bioenergy crops

KW - crop insurance

KW - establishment cost

KW - loss aversion

KW - miscanthus

KW - prospect theory

KW - switchgrass

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067391687&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85067391687&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/agec.12501

DO - 10.1111/agec.12501

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85067391687

VL - 50

SP - 435

EP - 450

JO - Agricultural Economics

JF - Agricultural Economics

SN - 0169-5150

IS - 4

ER -