Administrating patent litigation

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Recent patent litigation reform efforts have focused on every branch of government—Congress, the President, and the federal courts—save the fourth: administrative agencies. Agencies, however, possess a variety of functions in patent litigation: they serve as “gatekeepers” to litigation in federal court; they provide scientific and technical expertise to patent disputes; they review patent litigation to fulfill their own mandates; and they serve, in several instances, as entirely alternative fora to federal litigation. Understanding administrative agencies’ functions in managing or directing, i.e., “administrating,” patent litigation sheds both descriptive and normative insight on several aspects of patent reform. These include several problems inherent in patent litigation generally, and ways of fixing them that focus less on the identities or characteristics of litigants and more on agencies’ (and courts’) institutional incentives. This Article synoptically describes the functions of administrative agencies in patent litigation, elucidates several problems with agencies’ operation of those functions, and provides several cheap, easy, and politically viable solutions to better administrating patent litigation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)205-269
Number of pages65
JournalWashington Law Review
Volume90
Issue number1
StatePublished - 2015
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Law

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Administrating patent litigation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this