Adaptive versus reservation-based synchronization protocols-analysis and comparison

Hung Shiun Alex Chen, Lintian Qiao, Klara Nahrstedt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

With the expansion of distributed multimedia applications, such as video-phone, video-conference, and video-on-demand, synchronization among various media (time-dependent, time-independent) becomes an integral part of various protocols, mechanisms and services in the underlying computing and communication systems. The current systems allow and provide two different resource management environments where synchronization will be considered: (1) best effort resource management, and (2) reservation-based resource management with differentiation of service classes. Under these two resource management environments, our goal is to analyze and compare the design, implementation, and performance of synchronization protocols and services. Our approach to accomplish this complex analysis is inductive, because we select a representative protocol from each group, and consider an adaptive synchronization protocol on top of the best effort resource management and a reservation-based synchronization protocol on top of the reservation-based resource management. We believe that both protocols include a rich set of known synchronization algorithms and mechanisms, hence our resulting analysis and comparison show: (1) trade-offs/difference in design complexity of the synchronization protocols (space and time), (2) trade-offs/difference in implementation complexity of the synchronization protocols (space and time), and (3) magnitude of performance changes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)219-257
Number of pages39
JournalMultimedia Tools and Applications
Volume14
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2001

Fingerprint

Synchronization
Video on demand
Communication systems

Keywords

  • Adaptation
  • Multimedia
  • Reservation
  • Synchronization

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Software
  • Media Technology
  • Hardware and Architecture
  • Computer Networks and Communications

Cite this

Adaptive versus reservation-based synchronization protocols-analysis and comparison. / Chen, Hung Shiun Alex; Qiao, Lintian; Nahrstedt, Klara.

In: Multimedia Tools and Applications, Vol. 14, No. 3, 01.08.2001, p. 219-257.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{347c8290153f4aba921bb3413c70c761,
title = "Adaptive versus reservation-based synchronization protocols-analysis and comparison",
abstract = "With the expansion of distributed multimedia applications, such as video-phone, video-conference, and video-on-demand, synchronization among various media (time-dependent, time-independent) becomes an integral part of various protocols, mechanisms and services in the underlying computing and communication systems. The current systems allow and provide two different resource management environments where synchronization will be considered: (1) best effort resource management, and (2) reservation-based resource management with differentiation of service classes. Under these two resource management environments, our goal is to analyze and compare the design, implementation, and performance of synchronization protocols and services. Our approach to accomplish this complex analysis is inductive, because we select a representative protocol from each group, and consider an adaptive synchronization protocol on top of the best effort resource management and a reservation-based synchronization protocol on top of the reservation-based resource management. We believe that both protocols include a rich set of known synchronization algorithms and mechanisms, hence our resulting analysis and comparison show: (1) trade-offs/difference in design complexity of the synchronization protocols (space and time), (2) trade-offs/difference in implementation complexity of the synchronization protocols (space and time), and (3) magnitude of performance changes.",
keywords = "Adaptation, Multimedia, Reservation, Synchronization",
author = "Chen, {Hung Shiun Alex} and Lintian Qiao and Klara Nahrstedt",
year = "2001",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1023/A:1011304529211",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
pages = "219--257",
journal = "Multimedia Tools and Applications",
issn = "1380-7501",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Adaptive versus reservation-based synchronization protocols-analysis and comparison

AU - Chen, Hung Shiun Alex

AU - Qiao, Lintian

AU - Nahrstedt, Klara

PY - 2001/8/1

Y1 - 2001/8/1

N2 - With the expansion of distributed multimedia applications, such as video-phone, video-conference, and video-on-demand, synchronization among various media (time-dependent, time-independent) becomes an integral part of various protocols, mechanisms and services in the underlying computing and communication systems. The current systems allow and provide two different resource management environments where synchronization will be considered: (1) best effort resource management, and (2) reservation-based resource management with differentiation of service classes. Under these two resource management environments, our goal is to analyze and compare the design, implementation, and performance of synchronization protocols and services. Our approach to accomplish this complex analysis is inductive, because we select a representative protocol from each group, and consider an adaptive synchronization protocol on top of the best effort resource management and a reservation-based synchronization protocol on top of the reservation-based resource management. We believe that both protocols include a rich set of known synchronization algorithms and mechanisms, hence our resulting analysis and comparison show: (1) trade-offs/difference in design complexity of the synchronization protocols (space and time), (2) trade-offs/difference in implementation complexity of the synchronization protocols (space and time), and (3) magnitude of performance changes.

AB - With the expansion of distributed multimedia applications, such as video-phone, video-conference, and video-on-demand, synchronization among various media (time-dependent, time-independent) becomes an integral part of various protocols, mechanisms and services in the underlying computing and communication systems. The current systems allow and provide two different resource management environments where synchronization will be considered: (1) best effort resource management, and (2) reservation-based resource management with differentiation of service classes. Under these two resource management environments, our goal is to analyze and compare the design, implementation, and performance of synchronization protocols and services. Our approach to accomplish this complex analysis is inductive, because we select a representative protocol from each group, and consider an adaptive synchronization protocol on top of the best effort resource management and a reservation-based synchronization protocol on top of the reservation-based resource management. We believe that both protocols include a rich set of known synchronization algorithms and mechanisms, hence our resulting analysis and comparison show: (1) trade-offs/difference in design complexity of the synchronization protocols (space and time), (2) trade-offs/difference in implementation complexity of the synchronization protocols (space and time), and (3) magnitude of performance changes.

KW - Adaptation

KW - Multimedia

KW - Reservation

KW - Synchronization

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035425998&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035425998&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1023/A:1011304529211

DO - 10.1023/A:1011304529211

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0035425998

VL - 14

SP - 219

EP - 257

JO - Multimedia Tools and Applications

JF - Multimedia Tools and Applications

SN - 1380-7501

IS - 3

ER -