@article{325f4e5d8be34f3f8571460cf0c8ba31,
title = "Achieving and maintaining metadata quality: Toward a sustainable workflow for the IDEALS institutional repository",
abstract = "This article documents the steps taken to assess metadata errors within the IDEALS repository. It describes the workflows established to create accurate and consistent metadata, focusing especially on the batch ingest and retroactive metadata remediation processes. It also seeks to address theoretical issues surrounding the concept of metadata quality.",
keywords = "DSpace, Institutional repositories, Metadata, Metadata quality, Metadata quality assurance, Metadata remediation, Openrefine, Workflows",
author = "Ayla Stein and Applegate, {Kelly J.} and Seth Robbins",
note = "Funding Information: Kelly, Closier, and Hiom detailed a case study that implemented the QA Focus Methodology, a quality assurance framework, derived from the Joint Information Systems Committee (JISC) funded project, QA Focus. The Social Science Information Gateway (SOSIG) implemented the methodology by employing and training subject specialists; developed documentation that specifies policies, step-by-step instructions, and cataloging rules; employed controlled vocabularies and authorities whenever possible; used automatic checks for spelling and links; reviewed metadata regularly; and assessed metadata using the self-assessment toolkit developed by the QA Focus team.8 Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} Ayla Stein, Kelly J. Applegate, and Seth Robbins.",
year = "2017",
month = nov,
day = "17",
doi = "10.1080/01639374.2017.1358786",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "55",
pages = "644--666",
journal = "Cataloging and Classification Quarterly",
issn = "0163-9374",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "7-8",
}