Abusive supervision in advising relationships: Investigating the role of social support

Elizabeth V. Hobman, Simon Lloyd D Restubog, Prashant Bordia, Robert L. Tang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The present study examines the consequences of abusive supervision in an educational setting. The study contrasts the cross-domain stress-buffering hypothesis with the within-domain stress exacerbation hypothesis in examining the moderating role of advisor and team member support on the relationship between abusive supervision and student outcomes in student-advisor relationships. Using a temporal research design, results provided support for both hypotheses. In support of the stress exacerbation hypothesis, in the presence of high advisor support, there was a significant positive relationship between abusive supervision and anxiety, and a significant negative association between abusive supervision and psychological well-being. Consistent with the stress-buffering hypothesis, in the presence of high team member support, there was a negligible association between abusive supervision and satisfaction and anxiety.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)233-256
Number of pages24
JournalApplied Psychology
Volume58
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Social Support
Anxiety
Students
Research Design
Supervision
Psychology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Applied Psychology

Cite this

Abusive supervision in advising relationships : Investigating the role of social support. / Hobman, Elizabeth V.; Restubog, Simon Lloyd D; Bordia, Prashant; Tang, Robert L.

In: Applied Psychology, Vol. 58, No. 2, 01.04.2009, p. 233-256.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hobman, Elizabeth V. ; Restubog, Simon Lloyd D ; Bordia, Prashant ; Tang, Robert L. / Abusive supervision in advising relationships : Investigating the role of social support. In: Applied Psychology. 2009 ; Vol. 58, No. 2. pp. 233-256.
@article{6221896e4e844faba1c4d27811ef11f1,
title = "Abusive supervision in advising relationships: Investigating the role of social support",
abstract = "The present study examines the consequences of abusive supervision in an educational setting. The study contrasts the cross-domain stress-buffering hypothesis with the within-domain stress exacerbation hypothesis in examining the moderating role of advisor and team member support on the relationship between abusive supervision and student outcomes in student-advisor relationships. Using a temporal research design, results provided support for both hypotheses. In support of the stress exacerbation hypothesis, in the presence of high advisor support, there was a significant positive relationship between abusive supervision and anxiety, and a significant negative association between abusive supervision and psychological well-being. Consistent with the stress-buffering hypothesis, in the presence of high team member support, there was a negligible association between abusive supervision and satisfaction and anxiety.",
author = "Hobman, {Elizabeth V.} and Restubog, {Simon Lloyd D} and Prashant Bordia and Tang, {Robert L.}",
year = "2009",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1464-0597.2008.00330.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "58",
pages = "233--256",
journal = "Applied Psychology",
issn = "0269-994X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Abusive supervision in advising relationships

T2 - Investigating the role of social support

AU - Hobman, Elizabeth V.

AU - Restubog, Simon Lloyd D

AU - Bordia, Prashant

AU - Tang, Robert L.

PY - 2009/4/1

Y1 - 2009/4/1

N2 - The present study examines the consequences of abusive supervision in an educational setting. The study contrasts the cross-domain stress-buffering hypothesis with the within-domain stress exacerbation hypothesis in examining the moderating role of advisor and team member support on the relationship between abusive supervision and student outcomes in student-advisor relationships. Using a temporal research design, results provided support for both hypotheses. In support of the stress exacerbation hypothesis, in the presence of high advisor support, there was a significant positive relationship between abusive supervision and anxiety, and a significant negative association between abusive supervision and psychological well-being. Consistent with the stress-buffering hypothesis, in the presence of high team member support, there was a negligible association between abusive supervision and satisfaction and anxiety.

AB - The present study examines the consequences of abusive supervision in an educational setting. The study contrasts the cross-domain stress-buffering hypothesis with the within-domain stress exacerbation hypothesis in examining the moderating role of advisor and team member support on the relationship between abusive supervision and student outcomes in student-advisor relationships. Using a temporal research design, results provided support for both hypotheses. In support of the stress exacerbation hypothesis, in the presence of high advisor support, there was a significant positive relationship between abusive supervision and anxiety, and a significant negative association between abusive supervision and psychological well-being. Consistent with the stress-buffering hypothesis, in the presence of high team member support, there was a negligible association between abusive supervision and satisfaction and anxiety.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=61849184783&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=61849184783&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1464-0597.2008.00330.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1464-0597.2008.00330.x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:61849184783

VL - 58

SP - 233

EP - 256

JO - Applied Psychology

JF - Applied Psychology

SN - 0269-994X

IS - 2

ER -