Above Politics

Congress and the Supreme Court in 2017

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The Supreme Court figured prominently in the November 2016 elections because of the vacancy on the Court that resulted from the death of Justice Antonin Scalia. This Essay picks up the story by examining the place of the Supreme Court in national politics during 2017. It traces congressional efforts to respond to statutory and constitutional rulings by the Court as well as steps to regulate the operations of the Court and the work of the Justices. Although in 2017 Republicans and Democrats introduced numerous bills directed at the Court, these bills were generally modest in scope and, even so, did not make it through the legislative process by the close of the year. The Supreme Court prides itself on being above politics in the sense that it is guided solely by the rule of law. The 2017 experience suggests the Court may be above politics in a quite different sense: that it is beyond the reach of the political process and can decide cases with little risk of response from Congress.
Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)373-409
JournalChicago-Kent Law Review, Vol. 93, No. 2, 2018
Volume93
Issue number2
StatePublished - Aug 29 2018

Fingerprint

Supreme Court
politics
bill
justice
national politics
constitutional state
election
death
experience

Keywords

  • Supreme Court
  • Scalia
  • Separation of Powers
  • Overruling

Cite this

Above Politics : Congress and the Supreme Court in 2017. / Mazzone, Jason.

In: Chicago-Kent Law Review, Vol. 93, No. 2, 2018, Vol. 93, No. 2, 29.08.2018, p. 373-409.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1ba93285bd2140a492e88ff4c79ce951,
title = "Above Politics: Congress and the Supreme Court in 2017",
abstract = "The Supreme Court figured prominently in the November 2016 elections because of the vacancy on the Court that resulted from the death of Justice Antonin Scalia. This Essay picks up the story by examining the place of the Supreme Court in national politics during 2017. It traces congressional efforts to respond to statutory and constitutional rulings by the Court as well as steps to regulate the operations of the Court and the work of the Justices. Although in 2017 Republicans and Democrats introduced numerous bills directed at the Court, these bills were generally modest in scope and, even so, did not make it through the legislative process by the close of the year. The Supreme Court prides itself on being above politics in the sense that it is guided solely by the rule of law. The 2017 experience suggests the Court may be above politics in a quite different sense: that it is beyond the reach of the political process and can decide cases with little risk of response from Congress.",
keywords = "Supreme Court, Scalia, Separation of Powers, Overruling",
author = "Jason Mazzone",
year = "2018",
month = "8",
day = "29",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "93",
pages = "373--409",
journal = "Chicago-Kent Law Review, Vol. 93, No. 2, 2018",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Above Politics

T2 - Congress and the Supreme Court in 2017

AU - Mazzone, Jason

PY - 2018/8/29

Y1 - 2018/8/29

N2 - The Supreme Court figured prominently in the November 2016 elections because of the vacancy on the Court that resulted from the death of Justice Antonin Scalia. This Essay picks up the story by examining the place of the Supreme Court in national politics during 2017. It traces congressional efforts to respond to statutory and constitutional rulings by the Court as well as steps to regulate the operations of the Court and the work of the Justices. Although in 2017 Republicans and Democrats introduced numerous bills directed at the Court, these bills were generally modest in scope and, even so, did not make it through the legislative process by the close of the year. The Supreme Court prides itself on being above politics in the sense that it is guided solely by the rule of law. The 2017 experience suggests the Court may be above politics in a quite different sense: that it is beyond the reach of the political process and can decide cases with little risk of response from Congress.

AB - The Supreme Court figured prominently in the November 2016 elections because of the vacancy on the Court that resulted from the death of Justice Antonin Scalia. This Essay picks up the story by examining the place of the Supreme Court in national politics during 2017. It traces congressional efforts to respond to statutory and constitutional rulings by the Court as well as steps to regulate the operations of the Court and the work of the Justices. Although in 2017 Republicans and Democrats introduced numerous bills directed at the Court, these bills were generally modest in scope and, even so, did not make it through the legislative process by the close of the year. The Supreme Court prides itself on being above politics in the sense that it is guided solely by the rule of law. The 2017 experience suggests the Court may be above politics in a quite different sense: that it is beyond the reach of the political process and can decide cases with little risk of response from Congress.

KW - Supreme Court

KW - Scalia

KW - Separation of Powers

KW - Overruling

M3 - Article

VL - 93

SP - 373

EP - 409

JO - Chicago-Kent Law Review, Vol. 93, No. 2, 2018

JF - Chicago-Kent Law Review, Vol. 93, No. 2, 2018

IS - 2

ER -