Abstract
Typically, a family planning program seeks to alter individuals' fertility behavior. The very necessity for the existence of a family planning program presumes that individuals' fertility expectations and behavior are not yet consistent with the objectives of the program. Therefore, some individuals may choose not to cooperate. In this article I establish a theoretical framework for the evaluation of family planning programs by synthesizing the literature on the theory of collective action. Because of the characteristics of collective action - indivisibility and externality - noncooperation (free riding) is bound to occur. Faced with the problem of free riding, a good family planning program should ideally apply selective incentives, localize the costs and benefits, and invest in social capital. The relations among these three factors, cooperation, and fertility are also spelled out.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 49-67 |
Number of pages | 19 |
Journal | Population Research and Policy Review |
Volume | 13 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Mar 1994 |
Keywords
- Collective action
- Family planning
- Free rider
- Selective incentive
- Social capital
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Demography
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law