TY - JOUR
T1 - A systems examination of school food recovery in Northern Colorado
AU - Prescott, Melissa Pflugh
AU - Grove, Alicia
AU - Bunning, Marisa
AU - Cunningham-Sabo, Leslie
N1 - We would like to thank the school nutrition staff and food recovery professionals who volunteered their time and expertise to this project. We would also like to acknowledge Dr. Dawn Thilmany, Professor and Associate Department Head, Department of Agriculture and Resource Economics, Colorado State University, for her advice on the initial conception for this research project. We are also grateful to the undergraduate and graduate Colorado State University students who assisted with the data collection and data entry for this project. This material is based upon work supported by the National Institute of Food and Agriculture , U.S. Department of Agriculture , under award number 2017-67012-28197 . Any opinions, findings, or recommendations in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the view of the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Additional funding for this research was provided by the Colorado School of Public Health .
We would like to thank the school nutrition staff and food recovery professionals who volunteered their time and expertise to this project. We would also like to acknowledge Dr. Dawn Thilmany, Professor and Associate Department Head, Department of Agriculture and Resource Economics, Colorado State University, for her advice on the initial conception for this research project. We are also grateful to the undergraduate and graduate Colorado State University students who assisted with the data collection and data entry for this project. This material is based upon work supported by the National Institute of Food and Agriculture, U.S. Department of Agriculture, under award number 2017-67012-28197. Any opinions, findings, or recommendations in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the view of the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Additional funding for this research was provided by the Colorado School of Public Health.
PY - 2020/3
Y1 - 2020/3
N2 - Food recovery is a key strategy to address food waste concerns. School nutrition programs have significant amounts of food waste; yet, little is known about the prevalence and feasibility of school food recovery. In this mixed methods study, we identify potential school food recovery options and relevant systems factors, such as policies, resources, barriers, and competing priorities. To achieve these objectives, we conducted pre-consumer food waste audits and measured all wasted food recovered or landfilled at 14 school kitchens across three Northern Colorado school districts. Additionally, we interviewed professionals engaged in food recovery (n = 8) and school nutrition and sustainability staff (n = 20). The results indicate that the majority of food waste is landfilled, but food donation through share tables and appropriation of milk to food banks prior to long school breaks were viewed as the most feasible food recovery options. Liability concerns, increased expenses over landfilling, inconsistent wasted food volumes, and policy confusion hindered food recovery. Interviewees also viewed priorities to promote food safety and quality of recovered food as barriers. Key facilitators of food recovery were the desire to facilitate a cultural change to normalize food recovery among students and volunteers or advocates to address the food recovery labor needs. Interview participants across the system agreed that the training process required to sort uneaten foods had secondary benefits of equipping the next generation with environmental stewardship habits. Study findings underscore the interconnected nature of food safety, economics, and food recovery, and also suggest that systems-level solutions are warranted.
AB - Food recovery is a key strategy to address food waste concerns. School nutrition programs have significant amounts of food waste; yet, little is known about the prevalence and feasibility of school food recovery. In this mixed methods study, we identify potential school food recovery options and relevant systems factors, such as policies, resources, barriers, and competing priorities. To achieve these objectives, we conducted pre-consumer food waste audits and measured all wasted food recovered or landfilled at 14 school kitchens across three Northern Colorado school districts. Additionally, we interviewed professionals engaged in food recovery (n = 8) and school nutrition and sustainability staff (n = 20). The results indicate that the majority of food waste is landfilled, but food donation through share tables and appropriation of milk to food banks prior to long school breaks were viewed as the most feasible food recovery options. Liability concerns, increased expenses over landfilling, inconsistent wasted food volumes, and policy confusion hindered food recovery. Interviewees also viewed priorities to promote food safety and quality of recovered food as barriers. Key facilitators of food recovery were the desire to facilitate a cultural change to normalize food recovery among students and volunteers or advocates to address the food recovery labor needs. Interview participants across the system agreed that the training process required to sort uneaten foods had secondary benefits of equipping the next generation with environmental stewardship habits. Study findings underscore the interconnected nature of food safety, economics, and food recovery, and also suggest that systems-level solutions are warranted.
KW - Food recovery
KW - Food waste
KW - Policy
KW - School nutrition
KW - Waste diversion
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85074141131
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85074141131#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104529
DO - 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104529
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85074141131
SN - 0921-3449
VL - 154
JO - Resources, Conservation and Recycling
JF - Resources, Conservation and Recycling
M1 - 104529
ER -