Abstract
The article focuses on the U.S. court case Stern v. Marshall, which dealt with core jurisdiction in U.S. bankruptcy courts. Topics include the interpretation of constitutional law, adjudicatory authority, and plenary lawsuits. Information is provided on the U.S. Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1978 and summary-plenary distinction.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 121-189 |
| Number of pages | 69 |
| Journal | American Bankruptcy Law Journal |
| Volume | 86 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| State | Published - Jan 1 2012 |
Keywords
- Bankruptcy
- Administrative law
- Actions & defenses (Law) -- United States
- Jurisdiction
- Public law
- Constitutional law
- Law -- United States -- Interpretation & construction
- United States
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'A "Summary" Statutory and Constitutional Theory of Bankruptcy Judges' Core Jurisdiction After Stern v. Marshall.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS