A "Summary" Statutory and Constitutional Theory of Bankruptcy Judges' Core Jurisdiction After Stern v. Marshall.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The article focuses on the U.S. court case Stern v. Marshall, which dealt with core jurisdiction in U.S. bankruptcy courts. Topics include the interpretation of constitutional law, adjudicatory authority, and plenary lawsuits. Information is provided on the U.S. Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1978 and summary-plenary distinction.
Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)121-189
Number of pages69
JournalAmerican Bankruptcy Law Journal
Volume86
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jan 1 2012

Keywords

  • Bankruptcy
  • Administrative law
  • Actions & defenses (Law) -- United States
  • Jurisdiction
  • Public law
  • Constitutional law
  • Law -- United States -- Interpretation & construction
  • United States

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'A "Summary" Statutory and Constitutional Theory of Bankruptcy Judges' Core Jurisdiction After Stern v. Marshall.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this