TY - JOUR
T1 - A social-ecological framework for "micromanaging" microbial services
AU - Peralta, Ariane L.
AU - Stuart, Diana
AU - Kent, Angela D.
AU - Lennon, Jay T.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Ecological Society of America.
PY - 2014/11/1
Y1 - 2014/11/1
N2 - Despite playing a central role in the regulation of ecosystem services, microorganisms are often neglected when evaluating feedbacks between social and ecological systems. A social-ecological framework is a tool for evaluating how social factors affect ecosystems through human actions and how ecological factors in turn affect social systems through ecosystem services. Here, we consider linkages and trade-offs between social and biophysical factors that arise when unique microbial attributes such as complexity, dispersal, and rapid evolution are integrated into a social-ecological framework. Using case studies from food production systems, wastewater treatment facilities, and synthetic biology, we show that unintended dis-services can arise when microbial information is limited or is ignored as a result of socioeconomic policies and practices. In contrast, when knowledge about microorganisms is integrated into a social-ecological framework, we can identify how to best maximize microbial services. New scientific tools used to characterize microbial traits, communities, and functions will enhance our ability to monitor microorganisms in diverse systems. However, communication and collaboration among stakeholders - including policy makers, landowners, resource managers, and scientists - are also needed to foster more effective "micromanagement" of microbial services.
AB - Despite playing a central role in the regulation of ecosystem services, microorganisms are often neglected when evaluating feedbacks between social and ecological systems. A social-ecological framework is a tool for evaluating how social factors affect ecosystems through human actions and how ecological factors in turn affect social systems through ecosystem services. Here, we consider linkages and trade-offs between social and biophysical factors that arise when unique microbial attributes such as complexity, dispersal, and rapid evolution are integrated into a social-ecological framework. Using case studies from food production systems, wastewater treatment facilities, and synthetic biology, we show that unintended dis-services can arise when microbial information is limited or is ignored as a result of socioeconomic policies and practices. In contrast, when knowledge about microorganisms is integrated into a social-ecological framework, we can identify how to best maximize microbial services. New scientific tools used to characterize microbial traits, communities, and functions will enhance our ability to monitor microorganisms in diverse systems. However, communication and collaboration among stakeholders - including policy makers, landowners, resource managers, and scientists - are also needed to foster more effective "micromanagement" of microbial services.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84929659083&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84929659083&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1890/130308
DO - 10.1890/130308
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:84929659083
SN - 1540-9295
VL - 12
SP - 524
EP - 531
JO - Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment
JF - Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment
IS - 9
ER -