A Simple Low-Cost Method to Integrate Telehealth Interprofessional Team Members During In Situ Simulation

William F. Bond, Lisa T. Barker, Kimberly L. Cooley, Jessica D. Svendsen, William P. Tillis, Andrew L. Vincent, John A Vozenilek, Emilie S. Powell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Introduction With the growth of telehealth, simulation personnel will be called upon to support training that integrates these new technologies and processes. We sought to integrate remote telehealth electronic intensive care unit (eICU) personnel into in situ simulations with rural emergency department (ED) care teams. We describe how we overcame technical challenges of creating shared awareness of the patient's condition and the care team's progress among those executing the simulation, the care team, and the eICU. Methods The objective of the simulations was to introduce telehealth technology and new processes of engaging the eICU via telehealth during sepsis care in 2 rural EDs. Scenario development included experts in sepsis, telehealth, and emergency medicine. We describe the operational systems challenges, alternatives considered, and solutions used. Participants completed surveys on self-confidence presimulation/postsimulation in using telehealth and in managing patients with sepsis (1-10 Likert scale, with 10 "completely confident"). Pre-post responses were compared by two-tailed paired t test. Results We successfully engaged the staff of two EDs: 42 nurses, 9 physicians or advanced practice providers, and 9 technicians (N = 60). We used a shared in situ simulation clinical actions observational checklist, created within an off-the-shelf survey software program, completed during the simulations by an on-site observer, and shared with the eICU team via teleconferencing software, to message and cue eICU nurse engagement. The eICU nurse also participated in debriefing via the telehealth video system with successful simulation engagement. These solutions avoided interfering with real ED or eICU operations. The postsimulation mean ± SD ratings of confidence using telehealth increased from 5.3 ± 2.9 to 8.9 ± 1.1 (Δ3.5, P < 0.05) and in managing patients with sepsis increased from 7.1 ± 2.5 to 8.9 ± 1.1 (Δ1.8, P < 0.05). Conclusions We created shared awareness between remote eICU personnel and in situ simulations in rural EDs via a low-cost method using survey software combined with teleconferencing methods.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)129-136
Number of pages8
JournalSimulation in Healthcare
Volume14
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2019
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Intensive care units
Telemedicine
Intensive Care Units
Integrate
Electronics
Costs and Cost Analysis
simulation
Unit
costs
electronics
Costs
Sepsis
Simulation
Emergency
Teleconferencing
Software
Nurses
Personnel
Confidence
Hospital Emergency Service

Keywords

  • electronic intensive care unit
  • in situ simulation
  • simulation operations
  • telehealth

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology
  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Education
  • Modeling and Simulation

Cite this

Bond, W. F., Barker, L. T., Cooley, K. L., Svendsen, J. D., Tillis, W. P., Vincent, A. L., ... Powell, E. S. (2019). A Simple Low-Cost Method to Integrate Telehealth Interprofessional Team Members During In Situ Simulation. Simulation in Healthcare, 14(2), 129-136. https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000357

A Simple Low-Cost Method to Integrate Telehealth Interprofessional Team Members During In Situ Simulation. / Bond, William F.; Barker, Lisa T.; Cooley, Kimberly L.; Svendsen, Jessica D.; Tillis, William P.; Vincent, Andrew L.; Vozenilek, John A; Powell, Emilie S.

In: Simulation in Healthcare, Vol. 14, No. 2, 01.04.2019, p. 129-136.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bond, WF, Barker, LT, Cooley, KL, Svendsen, JD, Tillis, WP, Vincent, AL, Vozenilek, JA & Powell, ES 2019, 'A Simple Low-Cost Method to Integrate Telehealth Interprofessional Team Members During In Situ Simulation', Simulation in Healthcare, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 129-136. https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000357
Bond, William F. ; Barker, Lisa T. ; Cooley, Kimberly L. ; Svendsen, Jessica D. ; Tillis, William P. ; Vincent, Andrew L. ; Vozenilek, John A ; Powell, Emilie S. / A Simple Low-Cost Method to Integrate Telehealth Interprofessional Team Members During In Situ Simulation. In: Simulation in Healthcare. 2019 ; Vol. 14, No. 2. pp. 129-136.
@article{10728d32c34b4f5aa4ee07c58e221be6,
title = "A Simple Low-Cost Method to Integrate Telehealth Interprofessional Team Members During In Situ Simulation",
abstract = "Introduction With the growth of telehealth, simulation personnel will be called upon to support training that integrates these new technologies and processes. We sought to integrate remote telehealth electronic intensive care unit (eICU) personnel into in situ simulations with rural emergency department (ED) care teams. We describe how we overcame technical challenges of creating shared awareness of the patient's condition and the care team's progress among those executing the simulation, the care team, and the eICU. Methods The objective of the simulations was to introduce telehealth technology and new processes of engaging the eICU via telehealth during sepsis care in 2 rural EDs. Scenario development included experts in sepsis, telehealth, and emergency medicine. We describe the operational systems challenges, alternatives considered, and solutions used. Participants completed surveys on self-confidence presimulation/postsimulation in using telehealth and in managing patients with sepsis (1-10 Likert scale, with 10 {"}completely confident{"}). Pre-post responses were compared by two-tailed paired t test. Results We successfully engaged the staff of two EDs: 42 nurses, 9 physicians or advanced practice providers, and 9 technicians (N = 60). We used a shared in situ simulation clinical actions observational checklist, created within an off-the-shelf survey software program, completed during the simulations by an on-site observer, and shared with the eICU team via teleconferencing software, to message and cue eICU nurse engagement. The eICU nurse also participated in debriefing via the telehealth video system with successful simulation engagement. These solutions avoided interfering with real ED or eICU operations. The postsimulation mean ± SD ratings of confidence using telehealth increased from 5.3 ± 2.9 to 8.9 ± 1.1 (Δ3.5, P < 0.05) and in managing patients with sepsis increased from 7.1 ± 2.5 to 8.9 ± 1.1 (Δ1.8, P < 0.05). Conclusions We created shared awareness between remote eICU personnel and in situ simulations in rural EDs via a low-cost method using survey software combined with teleconferencing methods.",
keywords = "electronic intensive care unit, in situ simulation, simulation operations, telehealth",
author = "Bond, {William F.} and Barker, {Lisa T.} and Cooley, {Kimberly L.} and Svendsen, {Jessica D.} and Tillis, {William P.} and Vincent, {Andrew L.} and Vozenilek, {John A} and Powell, {Emilie S.}",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/SIH.0000000000000357",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
pages = "129--136",
journal = "Simulation in Healthcare",
issn = "1559-2332",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Simple Low-Cost Method to Integrate Telehealth Interprofessional Team Members During In Situ Simulation

AU - Bond, William F.

AU - Barker, Lisa T.

AU - Cooley, Kimberly L.

AU - Svendsen, Jessica D.

AU - Tillis, William P.

AU - Vincent, Andrew L.

AU - Vozenilek, John A

AU - Powell, Emilie S.

PY - 2019/4/1

Y1 - 2019/4/1

N2 - Introduction With the growth of telehealth, simulation personnel will be called upon to support training that integrates these new technologies and processes. We sought to integrate remote telehealth electronic intensive care unit (eICU) personnel into in situ simulations with rural emergency department (ED) care teams. We describe how we overcame technical challenges of creating shared awareness of the patient's condition and the care team's progress among those executing the simulation, the care team, and the eICU. Methods The objective of the simulations was to introduce telehealth technology and new processes of engaging the eICU via telehealth during sepsis care in 2 rural EDs. Scenario development included experts in sepsis, telehealth, and emergency medicine. We describe the operational systems challenges, alternatives considered, and solutions used. Participants completed surveys on self-confidence presimulation/postsimulation in using telehealth and in managing patients with sepsis (1-10 Likert scale, with 10 "completely confident"). Pre-post responses were compared by two-tailed paired t test. Results We successfully engaged the staff of two EDs: 42 nurses, 9 physicians or advanced practice providers, and 9 technicians (N = 60). We used a shared in situ simulation clinical actions observational checklist, created within an off-the-shelf survey software program, completed during the simulations by an on-site observer, and shared with the eICU team via teleconferencing software, to message and cue eICU nurse engagement. The eICU nurse also participated in debriefing via the telehealth video system with successful simulation engagement. These solutions avoided interfering with real ED or eICU operations. The postsimulation mean ± SD ratings of confidence using telehealth increased from 5.3 ± 2.9 to 8.9 ± 1.1 (Δ3.5, P < 0.05) and in managing patients with sepsis increased from 7.1 ± 2.5 to 8.9 ± 1.1 (Δ1.8, P < 0.05). Conclusions We created shared awareness between remote eICU personnel and in situ simulations in rural EDs via a low-cost method using survey software combined with teleconferencing methods.

AB - Introduction With the growth of telehealth, simulation personnel will be called upon to support training that integrates these new technologies and processes. We sought to integrate remote telehealth electronic intensive care unit (eICU) personnel into in situ simulations with rural emergency department (ED) care teams. We describe how we overcame technical challenges of creating shared awareness of the patient's condition and the care team's progress among those executing the simulation, the care team, and the eICU. Methods The objective of the simulations was to introduce telehealth technology and new processes of engaging the eICU via telehealth during sepsis care in 2 rural EDs. Scenario development included experts in sepsis, telehealth, and emergency medicine. We describe the operational systems challenges, alternatives considered, and solutions used. Participants completed surveys on self-confidence presimulation/postsimulation in using telehealth and in managing patients with sepsis (1-10 Likert scale, with 10 "completely confident"). Pre-post responses were compared by two-tailed paired t test. Results We successfully engaged the staff of two EDs: 42 nurses, 9 physicians or advanced practice providers, and 9 technicians (N = 60). We used a shared in situ simulation clinical actions observational checklist, created within an off-the-shelf survey software program, completed during the simulations by an on-site observer, and shared with the eICU team via teleconferencing software, to message and cue eICU nurse engagement. The eICU nurse also participated in debriefing via the telehealth video system with successful simulation engagement. These solutions avoided interfering with real ED or eICU operations. The postsimulation mean ± SD ratings of confidence using telehealth increased from 5.3 ± 2.9 to 8.9 ± 1.1 (Δ3.5, P < 0.05) and in managing patients with sepsis increased from 7.1 ± 2.5 to 8.9 ± 1.1 (Δ1.8, P < 0.05). Conclusions We created shared awareness between remote eICU personnel and in situ simulations in rural EDs via a low-cost method using survey software combined with teleconferencing methods.

KW - electronic intensive care unit

KW - in situ simulation

KW - simulation operations

KW - telehealth

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064224955&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85064224955&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000357

DO - 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000357

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 129

EP - 136

JO - Simulation in Healthcare

JF - Simulation in Healthcare

SN - 1559-2332

IS - 2

ER -