TY - JOUR
T1 - A scoping review of the involvement of children’s communication partners in aided augmentative and alternative communication modeling interventions
AU - Biggs, Elizabeth E.
AU - Carter, Erik W.
AU - Gilson, Carly B.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.
PY - 2019/5
Y1 - 2019/5
N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this study was to inform practice and research by identifying and synthesizing research on interventions in which natural communication partners implemented aided augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) modeling strategies. Method: A scoping review yielded 29 studies. Data were charted related to participant characteristics, intervention characteristics, partner instruction and assessment, and partner perspectives of social validity. Results: More than 157 peer and 100 adult communication partners (e.g., parents, special educators, paraprofessionals) implemented aided AAC modeling strategies within included studies. To teach communication partners intervention strategies, researchers frequently reported using (a) oral instruction, (b) modeling, and (c) practice or application opportunities with performance feedback. Partner instruction frequently involved both training and concurrent support (e.g., coaching, facilitation, consultation, follow-up support). Conclusion: Findings from this review inform the design and delivery of aided AAC modeling interventions by children’s natural communication partners. Findings also highlight important avenues for enhancing the rigor of future research on interventions involving aided AAC modeling, including the quality of reporting and application of principles from implementation science.
AB - Purpose: The purpose of this study was to inform practice and research by identifying and synthesizing research on interventions in which natural communication partners implemented aided augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) modeling strategies. Method: A scoping review yielded 29 studies. Data were charted related to participant characteristics, intervention characteristics, partner instruction and assessment, and partner perspectives of social validity. Results: More than 157 peer and 100 adult communication partners (e.g., parents, special educators, paraprofessionals) implemented aided AAC modeling strategies within included studies. To teach communication partners intervention strategies, researchers frequently reported using (a) oral instruction, (b) modeling, and (c) practice or application opportunities with performance feedback. Partner instruction frequently involved both training and concurrent support (e.g., coaching, facilitation, consultation, follow-up support). Conclusion: Findings from this review inform the design and delivery of aided AAC modeling interventions by children’s natural communication partners. Findings also highlight important avenues for enhancing the rigor of future research on interventions involving aided AAC modeling, including the quality of reporting and application of principles from implementation science.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067267335&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85067267335&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1044/2018_AJSLP-18-0024
DO - 10.1044/2018_AJSLP-18-0024
M3 - Review article
C2 - 31039322
AN - SCOPUS:85067267335
SN - 1058-0360
VL - 28
SP - 743
EP - 758
JO - American journal of speech-language pathology
JF - American journal of speech-language pathology
IS - 2
ER -