Abstract

This article proposes a conceptual framework for ranking the relative gravity of diverse risks. This framework identifies the moral considerations that should inform the evaluation and comparison of diverse risks. A common definition of risk includes two dimensions: the probability of occurrence and the associated consequences of a set of hazardous scenarios. This article first expands this definition to include a third dimension: the source of a risk. The source of a risk refers to the agents involved in the creation or maintenance of a risk and captures a central moral concern about risks. Then, a scale of risk is proposed to categorize risks along a multidimensional ranking, based on a comparative evaluation of the consequences, probability, and source of a given risk. A risk is ranked higher on the scale the larger the consequences, the greater the probability, and the more morally culpable the source. The information from the proposed comparative evaluation of risks can inform the selection of priorities for risk mitigation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1208-1227
Number of pages20
JournalRisk Analysis
Volume34
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2014

Fingerprint

Gravitation
Maintenance

Keywords

  • Moral considerations
  • Ranking
  • Risk comparison
  • Risk evaluation
  • Source
  • Taxonomy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
  • Physiology (medical)

Cite this

A Scale of Risk. / Gardoni, Paolo; Murphy, Colleen.

In: Risk Analysis, Vol. 34, No. 7, 07.2014, p. 1208-1227.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gardoni, Paolo ; Murphy, Colleen. / A Scale of Risk. In: Risk Analysis. 2014 ; Vol. 34, No. 7. pp. 1208-1227.
@article{d6c131f320714afcb56d910ca0613651,
title = "A Scale of Risk",
abstract = "This article proposes a conceptual framework for ranking the relative gravity of diverse risks. This framework identifies the moral considerations that should inform the evaluation and comparison of diverse risks. A common definition of risk includes two dimensions: the probability of occurrence and the associated consequences of a set of hazardous scenarios. This article first expands this definition to include a third dimension: the source of a risk. The source of a risk refers to the agents involved in the creation or maintenance of a risk and captures a central moral concern about risks. Then, a scale of risk is proposed to categorize risks along a multidimensional ranking, based on a comparative evaluation of the consequences, probability, and source of a given risk. A risk is ranked higher on the scale the larger the consequences, the greater the probability, and the more morally culpable the source. The information from the proposed comparative evaluation of risks can inform the selection of priorities for risk mitigation.",
keywords = "Moral considerations, Ranking, Risk comparison, Risk evaluation, Source, Taxonomy",
author = "Paolo Gardoni and Colleen Murphy",
year = "2014",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1111/risa.12150",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "34",
pages = "1208--1227",
journal = "Risk Analysis",
issn = "0272-4332",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Scale of Risk

AU - Gardoni, Paolo

AU - Murphy, Colleen

PY - 2014/7

Y1 - 2014/7

N2 - This article proposes a conceptual framework for ranking the relative gravity of diverse risks. This framework identifies the moral considerations that should inform the evaluation and comparison of diverse risks. A common definition of risk includes two dimensions: the probability of occurrence and the associated consequences of a set of hazardous scenarios. This article first expands this definition to include a third dimension: the source of a risk. The source of a risk refers to the agents involved in the creation or maintenance of a risk and captures a central moral concern about risks. Then, a scale of risk is proposed to categorize risks along a multidimensional ranking, based on a comparative evaluation of the consequences, probability, and source of a given risk. A risk is ranked higher on the scale the larger the consequences, the greater the probability, and the more morally culpable the source. The information from the proposed comparative evaluation of risks can inform the selection of priorities for risk mitigation.

AB - This article proposes a conceptual framework for ranking the relative gravity of diverse risks. This framework identifies the moral considerations that should inform the evaluation and comparison of diverse risks. A common definition of risk includes two dimensions: the probability of occurrence and the associated consequences of a set of hazardous scenarios. This article first expands this definition to include a third dimension: the source of a risk. The source of a risk refers to the agents involved in the creation or maintenance of a risk and captures a central moral concern about risks. Then, a scale of risk is proposed to categorize risks along a multidimensional ranking, based on a comparative evaluation of the consequences, probability, and source of a given risk. A risk is ranked higher on the scale the larger the consequences, the greater the probability, and the more morally culpable the source. The information from the proposed comparative evaluation of risks can inform the selection of priorities for risk mitigation.

KW - Moral considerations

KW - Ranking

KW - Risk comparison

KW - Risk evaluation

KW - Source

KW - Taxonomy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84905006072&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84905006072&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/risa.12150

DO - 10.1111/risa.12150

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84905006072

VL - 34

SP - 1208

EP - 1227

JO - Risk Analysis

JF - Risk Analysis

SN - 0272-4332

IS - 7

ER -