A response-surface examination of competition and facilitation between native and invasive juvenile fishes

Kirsten A. Nelson, Scott F. Collins, Greg G. Sass, David H Wahl

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Ecological theory has long recognised the importance of positive and negative species interactions as drivers of food web structure, yet many studies have only focused on competition. Because competitive and facilitative mechanisms operate simultaneously, but through different food web pathways, the balance of their combined effects can produce complex and variable responses. We used a response-surface experimental design to assess the roles of negative (e.g. intra-, interspecific competition) and positive (e.g. facilitation) interactions between native and invasive juvenile fishes. We tested whether these interactions alter the densities of planktonic and benthic invertebrates to evaluate the magnitude and mechanism(s) influencing the acceptance or resistance of biological invaders. Interactions between bighead carp (Hypophthalmichthys nobilis) and bluegill (Lepomis macrochirus) or common carp (Cyprinus carpio) were evaluated in mesocosms. Intraspecific interactions were 1.5–2.4 times stronger than interspecific interactions between carp species. The only instance of interspecific competition resulted in bighead carp reducing the daily growth of bluegill, whereas the reciprocal interaction resulted in facilitation. Facilitation occurred when bluegill increased the daily growth of low density bighead carp treatments, despite increased numbers of fishes. Bighead carp also increased densities of benthic Chironomidae larvae, which were subsequently consumed by bluegill, but did not result in enhanced bluegill growth. These suites of interactions were not observed between common and bighead carp. Our response-surface design proved useful for comparing the relative magnitude of intra- vs. interspecific competition, identifying facilitation among species, and tracing attendant effects on invertebrate communities. By accounting for the directionality of interactions within our experimental framework and tracking responses of prey at lower trophic levels, we provide a clearer understanding of how competitive effects and stressed consumers alter prey communities and influence facilitation. A plain language summary is available for this article.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2157-2166
Number of pages10
JournalFunctional Ecology
Volume31
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2017

Fingerprint

Hypophthalmichthys nobilis
Lepomis macrochirus
facilitation
interspecific competition
fish
Cyprinus carpio
food web
invertebrate
food webs
intraspecific interaction
invertebrates
ecological theory
interspecific interaction
experimental design
biological resistance
trophic level
Chironomidae
carp
larva
larvae

Keywords

  • bighead carp
  • bluegill
  • common carp
  • invasion meltdown hypothesis
  • invasive species
  • planktivory
  • zooplankton

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Cite this

A response-surface examination of competition and facilitation between native and invasive juvenile fishes. / Nelson, Kirsten A.; Collins, Scott F.; Sass, Greg G.; Wahl, David H.

In: Functional Ecology, Vol. 31, No. 11, 11.2017, p. 2157-2166.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Nelson, Kirsten A. ; Collins, Scott F. ; Sass, Greg G. ; Wahl, David H. / A response-surface examination of competition and facilitation between native and invasive juvenile fishes. In: Functional Ecology. 2017 ; Vol. 31, No. 11. pp. 2157-2166.
@article{e42470fa258f45bd92bb3bcba874798f,
title = "A response-surface examination of competition and facilitation between native and invasive juvenile fishes",
abstract = "Ecological theory has long recognised the importance of positive and negative species interactions as drivers of food web structure, yet many studies have only focused on competition. Because competitive and facilitative mechanisms operate simultaneously, but through different food web pathways, the balance of their combined effects can produce complex and variable responses. We used a response-surface experimental design to assess the roles of negative (e.g. intra-, interspecific competition) and positive (e.g. facilitation) interactions between native and invasive juvenile fishes. We tested whether these interactions alter the densities of planktonic and benthic invertebrates to evaluate the magnitude and mechanism(s) influencing the acceptance or resistance of biological invaders. Interactions between bighead carp (Hypophthalmichthys nobilis) and bluegill (Lepomis macrochirus) or common carp (Cyprinus carpio) were evaluated in mesocosms. Intraspecific interactions were 1.5–2.4 times stronger than interspecific interactions between carp species. The only instance of interspecific competition resulted in bighead carp reducing the daily growth of bluegill, whereas the reciprocal interaction resulted in facilitation. Facilitation occurred when bluegill increased the daily growth of low density bighead carp treatments, despite increased numbers of fishes. Bighead carp also increased densities of benthic Chironomidae larvae, which were subsequently consumed by bluegill, but did not result in enhanced bluegill growth. These suites of interactions were not observed between common and bighead carp. Our response-surface design proved useful for comparing the relative magnitude of intra- vs. interspecific competition, identifying facilitation among species, and tracing attendant effects on invertebrate communities. By accounting for the directionality of interactions within our experimental framework and tracking responses of prey at lower trophic levels, we provide a clearer understanding of how competitive effects and stressed consumers alter prey communities and influence facilitation. A plain language summary is available for this article.",
keywords = "bighead carp, bluegill, common carp, invasion meltdown hypothesis, invasive species, planktivory, zooplankton",
author = "Nelson, {Kirsten A.} and Collins, {Scott F.} and Sass, {Greg G.} and Wahl, {David H}",
year = "2017",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1111/1365-2435.12922",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
pages = "2157--2166",
journal = "Functional Ecology",
issn = "0269-8463",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A response-surface examination of competition and facilitation between native and invasive juvenile fishes

AU - Nelson, Kirsten A.

AU - Collins, Scott F.

AU - Sass, Greg G.

AU - Wahl, David H

PY - 2017/11

Y1 - 2017/11

N2 - Ecological theory has long recognised the importance of positive and negative species interactions as drivers of food web structure, yet many studies have only focused on competition. Because competitive and facilitative mechanisms operate simultaneously, but through different food web pathways, the balance of their combined effects can produce complex and variable responses. We used a response-surface experimental design to assess the roles of negative (e.g. intra-, interspecific competition) and positive (e.g. facilitation) interactions between native and invasive juvenile fishes. We tested whether these interactions alter the densities of planktonic and benthic invertebrates to evaluate the magnitude and mechanism(s) influencing the acceptance or resistance of biological invaders. Interactions between bighead carp (Hypophthalmichthys nobilis) and bluegill (Lepomis macrochirus) or common carp (Cyprinus carpio) were evaluated in mesocosms. Intraspecific interactions were 1.5–2.4 times stronger than interspecific interactions between carp species. The only instance of interspecific competition resulted in bighead carp reducing the daily growth of bluegill, whereas the reciprocal interaction resulted in facilitation. Facilitation occurred when bluegill increased the daily growth of low density bighead carp treatments, despite increased numbers of fishes. Bighead carp also increased densities of benthic Chironomidae larvae, which were subsequently consumed by bluegill, but did not result in enhanced bluegill growth. These suites of interactions were not observed between common and bighead carp. Our response-surface design proved useful for comparing the relative magnitude of intra- vs. interspecific competition, identifying facilitation among species, and tracing attendant effects on invertebrate communities. By accounting for the directionality of interactions within our experimental framework and tracking responses of prey at lower trophic levels, we provide a clearer understanding of how competitive effects and stressed consumers alter prey communities and influence facilitation. A plain language summary is available for this article.

AB - Ecological theory has long recognised the importance of positive and negative species interactions as drivers of food web structure, yet many studies have only focused on competition. Because competitive and facilitative mechanisms operate simultaneously, but through different food web pathways, the balance of their combined effects can produce complex and variable responses. We used a response-surface experimental design to assess the roles of negative (e.g. intra-, interspecific competition) and positive (e.g. facilitation) interactions between native and invasive juvenile fishes. We tested whether these interactions alter the densities of planktonic and benthic invertebrates to evaluate the magnitude and mechanism(s) influencing the acceptance or resistance of biological invaders. Interactions between bighead carp (Hypophthalmichthys nobilis) and bluegill (Lepomis macrochirus) or common carp (Cyprinus carpio) were evaluated in mesocosms. Intraspecific interactions were 1.5–2.4 times stronger than interspecific interactions between carp species. The only instance of interspecific competition resulted in bighead carp reducing the daily growth of bluegill, whereas the reciprocal interaction resulted in facilitation. Facilitation occurred when bluegill increased the daily growth of low density bighead carp treatments, despite increased numbers of fishes. Bighead carp also increased densities of benthic Chironomidae larvae, which were subsequently consumed by bluegill, but did not result in enhanced bluegill growth. These suites of interactions were not observed between common and bighead carp. Our response-surface design proved useful for comparing the relative magnitude of intra- vs. interspecific competition, identifying facilitation among species, and tracing attendant effects on invertebrate communities. By accounting for the directionality of interactions within our experimental framework and tracking responses of prey at lower trophic levels, we provide a clearer understanding of how competitive effects and stressed consumers alter prey communities and influence facilitation. A plain language summary is available for this article.

KW - bighead carp

KW - bluegill

KW - common carp

KW - invasion meltdown hypothesis

KW - invasive species

KW - planktivory

KW - zooplankton

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85022330829&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85022330829&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/1365-2435.12922

DO - 10.1111/1365-2435.12922

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85022330829

VL - 31

SP - 2157

EP - 2166

JO - Functional Ecology

JF - Functional Ecology

SN - 0269-8463

IS - 11

ER -