A Reassessment of urban structure and land-use patterns: distance to CBD or network-based? — Evidence from Chicago

Haozhi Pan, Brian M Deal, Yan Chen, Geoffrey Hewings

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Distance to the CBD and neighboring commercial employment (land-use) have been the core determinants of spatial-related production externalities for firms. In these models, travel time to work (firms) is the single most important factor for residential land-use allocation. New theories of complex urban systems (CUS), however, have begun to cast some doubt on the efficacy of the “distance to CBD” model. There is some evidence for example, that large urban systems might evolve with scale-free transportation networks. In this paper, we examine urban land-use data from the Chicago Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) to argue for a theoretical shift from a “distance to CBD” based prototype to one that considers the complexity inherent in urban systems structure. We use a Stochastic Greedy Algorithm to quantify connectivity and attractions to every land cell (30 × 30 m) to existing population and employment centers, Points of Interests (POIs), and highway and major roads. We measure the frequency of commercial and resident land-uses relative to these found attraction levels and develop algorithms that help explain the relations. Using these methods, we find that both CBD-driven and network-driven approaches are empirically valid for explaining current urban structures. We also find, however, that these relations change when temporal variables are considered. For example, we found that the land-use change in Chicago from 2001 to 2011 is an obvious deviation from the “distance to CBD” based urban growth assumption. Our results suggest that we should re-examine the core urban structure assumptions of spatial equilibrium models.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)215-228
Number of pages14
JournalRegional Science and Urban Economics
Volume70
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2018

Fingerprint

urban structure
urban system
land use
evidence
road
firm
urban growth
system structure
travel time
land use change
connectivity
equilibrium model
travel
Urban structure
Land use
determinants
resident
Urban system
Attraction

Keywords

  • CBD
  • Complex urban system
  • Greedy algorithm
  • Land-use
  • Production externalities
  • Scale-free networks

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Urban Studies

Cite this

A Reassessment of urban structure and land-use patterns : distance to CBD or network-based? — Evidence from Chicago. / Pan, Haozhi; Deal, Brian M; Chen, Yan; Hewings, Geoffrey.

In: Regional Science and Urban Economics, Vol. 70, 05.2018, p. 215-228.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b913f12f9177463388d4721bbb2f2a60,
title = "A Reassessment of urban structure and land-use patterns: distance to CBD or network-based? — Evidence from Chicago",
abstract = "Distance to the CBD and neighboring commercial employment (land-use) have been the core determinants of spatial-related production externalities for firms. In these models, travel time to work (firms) is the single most important factor for residential land-use allocation. New theories of complex urban systems (CUS), however, have begun to cast some doubt on the efficacy of the “distance to CBD” model. There is some evidence for example, that large urban systems might evolve with scale-free transportation networks. In this paper, we examine urban land-use data from the Chicago Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) to argue for a theoretical shift from a “distance to CBD” based prototype to one that considers the complexity inherent in urban systems structure. We use a Stochastic Greedy Algorithm to quantify connectivity and attractions to every land cell (30 × 30 m) to existing population and employment centers, Points of Interests (POIs), and highway and major roads. We measure the frequency of commercial and resident land-uses relative to these found attraction levels and develop algorithms that help explain the relations. Using these methods, we find that both CBD-driven and network-driven approaches are empirically valid for explaining current urban structures. We also find, however, that these relations change when temporal variables are considered. For example, we found that the land-use change in Chicago from 2001 to 2011 is an obvious deviation from the “distance to CBD” based urban growth assumption. Our results suggest that we should re-examine the core urban structure assumptions of spatial equilibrium models.",
keywords = "CBD, Complex urban system, Greedy algorithm, Land-use, Production externalities, Scale-free networks",
author = "Haozhi Pan and Deal, {Brian M} and Yan Chen and Geoffrey Hewings",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2018.04.009",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "70",
pages = "215--228",
journal = "Regional Science and Urban Economics",
issn = "0166-0462",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Reassessment of urban structure and land-use patterns

T2 - distance to CBD or network-based? — Evidence from Chicago

AU - Pan, Haozhi

AU - Deal, Brian M

AU - Chen, Yan

AU - Hewings, Geoffrey

PY - 2018/5

Y1 - 2018/5

N2 - Distance to the CBD and neighboring commercial employment (land-use) have been the core determinants of spatial-related production externalities for firms. In these models, travel time to work (firms) is the single most important factor for residential land-use allocation. New theories of complex urban systems (CUS), however, have begun to cast some doubt on the efficacy of the “distance to CBD” model. There is some evidence for example, that large urban systems might evolve with scale-free transportation networks. In this paper, we examine urban land-use data from the Chicago Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) to argue for a theoretical shift from a “distance to CBD” based prototype to one that considers the complexity inherent in urban systems structure. We use a Stochastic Greedy Algorithm to quantify connectivity and attractions to every land cell (30 × 30 m) to existing population and employment centers, Points of Interests (POIs), and highway and major roads. We measure the frequency of commercial and resident land-uses relative to these found attraction levels and develop algorithms that help explain the relations. Using these methods, we find that both CBD-driven and network-driven approaches are empirically valid for explaining current urban structures. We also find, however, that these relations change when temporal variables are considered. For example, we found that the land-use change in Chicago from 2001 to 2011 is an obvious deviation from the “distance to CBD” based urban growth assumption. Our results suggest that we should re-examine the core urban structure assumptions of spatial equilibrium models.

AB - Distance to the CBD and neighboring commercial employment (land-use) have been the core determinants of spatial-related production externalities for firms. In these models, travel time to work (firms) is the single most important factor for residential land-use allocation. New theories of complex urban systems (CUS), however, have begun to cast some doubt on the efficacy of the “distance to CBD” model. There is some evidence for example, that large urban systems might evolve with scale-free transportation networks. In this paper, we examine urban land-use data from the Chicago Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) to argue for a theoretical shift from a “distance to CBD” based prototype to one that considers the complexity inherent in urban systems structure. We use a Stochastic Greedy Algorithm to quantify connectivity and attractions to every land cell (30 × 30 m) to existing population and employment centers, Points of Interests (POIs), and highway and major roads. We measure the frequency of commercial and resident land-uses relative to these found attraction levels and develop algorithms that help explain the relations. Using these methods, we find that both CBD-driven and network-driven approaches are empirically valid for explaining current urban structures. We also find, however, that these relations change when temporal variables are considered. For example, we found that the land-use change in Chicago from 2001 to 2011 is an obvious deviation from the “distance to CBD” based urban growth assumption. Our results suggest that we should re-examine the core urban structure assumptions of spatial equilibrium models.

KW - CBD

KW - Complex urban system

KW - Greedy algorithm

KW - Land-use

KW - Production externalities

KW - Scale-free networks

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046075777&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85046075777&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2018.04.009

DO - 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2018.04.009

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85046075777

VL - 70

SP - 215

EP - 228

JO - Regional Science and Urban Economics

JF - Regional Science and Urban Economics

SN - 0166-0462

ER -