A Random CSP with Connections to Discrepancy Theory and Randomized Trials

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

We introduce a random constraint satisfaction problem (CSP) with non-uniform constraints that is closely related to the average-case discrepancy minimization problem in the non-proportional regime. Our proposal is particularly motivated by randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in statistics, involving different constraints. For the random CSP that we propose, we establish a sharp phase transition result regarding the existence of its solutions. We then precisely pinpoint the distance between the solution spaces corresponding to independent problem instances. In the context of RCTs, this quantifies the amount of reassignments needed if a similar RCT is to be repeated with an independent population and/or a potentially different set of constraints. We lastly study the solution space geometry, and show that, for certain values of constraints, the solutions are isolated singletons separated by linear Hamming distance.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publication2024 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory, ISIT 2024 - Proceedings
PublisherInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
Pages3041-3046
Number of pages6
ISBN (Electronic)9798350382846
DOIs
StatePublished - 2024
Event2024 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory, ISIT 2024 - Athens, Greece
Duration: Jul 7 2024Jul 12 2024

Publication series

NameIEEE International Symposium on Information Theory - Proceedings
ISSN (Print)2157-8095

Conference

Conference2024 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory, ISIT 2024
Country/TerritoryGreece
CityAthens
Period7/7/247/12/24

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Theoretical Computer Science
  • Information Systems
  • Modeling and Simulation
  • Applied Mathematics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A Random CSP with Connections to Discrepancy Theory and Randomized Trials'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this