A prospective test of the hopelessness theory of depression in adolescence

Benjamin L. Hankin, Lyn Y. Abramson, Mara Siler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


Depression increases sharply during adolescence. This study prospectively investigated etiological predictions from the hopelessness theory of depression (Abramson, Metalsky, & Alloy, 1989) among a sample of middle to late adolescents to examine whether this theory can be applied to this important age group. High school students completed measures of attributional style, hopelessness, negative stressors, general depressive symptoms, and specific hypothesized hopelessness depressive (HD) symptoms at two times separated by 5 weeks. Results showed that the attributional style × stress interaction predicted increases in depressive symptoms from T1 to T2. Gender moderated this interaction for the BDI such that the vulnerability-stress component held for boys, but not girls. Consistent with the vulnerability-stress component of the theory, these effects held for the increase in HD symptoms for both boys and girls, but not non-HD symptoms. Mediational analyses did not provide consistent support for hopelessness as a mediator of this association. These results were mostly the same whether the internal, stable, and global dimensions versus only the stable, global dimensions of attributional style were used to operationalize cognitive vulnerability. Overall, results suggest that the cognitive vulnerability-stress aspect of the hopelessness theory can be applied to middle to late adolescence.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)607-632
Number of pages26
JournalCognitive Therapy and Research
Issue number5
StatePublished - Oct 2001
Externally publishedYes


  • adolescence
  • depressive symptoms
  • hopelessness theory
  • stress
  • vulnerability

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology


Dive into the research topics of 'A prospective test of the hopelessness theory of depression in adolescence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this