A Postscript on Thinking about Dialogue

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This article offers an interpretation of different notions of dialogue as are evident in a broad literature in the social sciences and the humanities. It sets the previous articles within this broad context while suggesting ways in which the nature, aim and methods of evaluation, as well as the roles and obligations of the evaluator, are connected to these different understandings of dialogue.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)264-276
Number of pages13
JournalEvaluation
Volume7
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2001

Fingerprint

dialogue
obligation
social science
interpretation
evaluation
method
literature

Keywords

  • instrumental and substantive approaches of dialogue
  • praxis
  • types of dialogue

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Development
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

A Postscript on Thinking about Dialogue. / Schwandt, Thomas A.

In: Evaluation, Vol. 7, No. 2, 01.04.2001, p. 264-276.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8456f7431dfb4dafa756880ee0d70db6,
title = "A Postscript on Thinking about Dialogue",
abstract = "This article offers an interpretation of different notions of dialogue as are evident in a broad literature in the social sciences and the humanities. It sets the previous articles within this broad context while suggesting ways in which the nature, aim and methods of evaluation, as well as the roles and obligations of the evaluator, are connected to these different understandings of dialogue.",
keywords = "instrumental and substantive approaches of dialogue, praxis, types of dialogue",
author = "Schwandt, {Thomas A.}",
year = "2001",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/135638900100700210",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
pages = "264--276",
journal = "Evaluation",
issn = "1356-3890",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Postscript on Thinking about Dialogue

AU - Schwandt, Thomas A.

PY - 2001/4/1

Y1 - 2001/4/1

N2 - This article offers an interpretation of different notions of dialogue as are evident in a broad literature in the social sciences and the humanities. It sets the previous articles within this broad context while suggesting ways in which the nature, aim and methods of evaluation, as well as the roles and obligations of the evaluator, are connected to these different understandings of dialogue.

AB - This article offers an interpretation of different notions of dialogue as are evident in a broad literature in the social sciences and the humanities. It sets the previous articles within this broad context while suggesting ways in which the nature, aim and methods of evaluation, as well as the roles and obligations of the evaluator, are connected to these different understandings of dialogue.

KW - instrumental and substantive approaches of dialogue

KW - praxis

KW - types of dialogue

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0000355333&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0000355333&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/135638900100700210

DO - 10.1177/135638900100700210

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0000355333

VL - 7

SP - 264

EP - 276

JO - Evaluation

JF - Evaluation

SN - 1356-3890

IS - 2

ER -