A parametric study of cochlear input impedance

Sunil Puria, Jont B. Allen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

In this paper various aspects of the cat cochlear input impedance Zc(ω) are implemented using a transmission line model having perilymph viscosity and a varying cross-sectional scalae area. These model results are then compared to the experimental results of Lynch et al. [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 72, 108–130 (1982) ]. From the model, the following observations are made about the cochlear input impedance: (a) Scalae area variations significantly alter the model Zc(ω); (b) the use of anatomically measured areas improves the fits to the experimental data; (c) improved agreement between model and experimental phase is obtained when perilymph viscosity and tapering are included in the cochlear model for frequencies below ≈150 Hz; (d) when model scalae tapering and perilymph viscosity are chosen to match physiological conditions, the effect of the helicotrema impedance on Zc(ω) is insignificant; and (e) the cochlear map, which is defined as the position of the basilar membrane peak displacement as a function of stimulus frequency, can have an important effect on Zc{o>) for frequencies below 500 Hz. A nonphysiological cochlear map can give rise to cochlear standing waves, which result in oscillations in Zc(ω). Scalae tapering and perilymph viscosity contribute significantly to the damping of these standing waves. These observations should dispel the previous notion that Zc(ω) is determined solely by parameters of the cochlea close to the stapes, and the notion that Zc(ω) is dominated by the helicotrema at low frequencies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)287-309
Number of pages23
JournalJournal of the Acoustical Society of America
Volume89
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1991
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A parametric study of cochlear input impedance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this