TY - JOUR
T1 - A numerical simulation study of particulate collection by vegetative barriers
AU - Ma, Shuli
AU - Maghirang, Ronaldo
AU - Zhao, Dongsen
AU - Liu, Xiaolin
AU - Wang, Chun
AU - Guo, Li
N1 - This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 51575228 and 41501510 ), the Research Foundation of Science and Technology Department of Jilin Province (Grant No 20190302040GX ) and the “13th Five-Year Plan” Scientific Research Foundation of the Education Department of Jilin Province (Grant No 2016-439 ).
PY - 2019/10
Y1 - 2019/10
N2 - Previous research has shown that particulate matter (PM) in the air can be captured by vegetative barriers (VB) serving as shelter against the wind; however, there is only limited research of factors affecting their efficiency. This study used computational fluid dynamics to predict particle collection efficiency (CE) of VBs, as affected by hedge geometry (i.e., the size expressed in terms of height, depth, and leaf surface area density [LSAD]) and the number of hedgerows. The experimental data of Tiwary et al. (Journal of Aerosol Science, 2005) were used for model parametrisation. The area of wind speed reduction, protection area and mean collection efficiency were defined and calculated to evaluate the effectiveness of VBs on sheltering function and particle collection. Simulation results predicted that compared with original size, increasing the height and LSAD of the hedge resulted in a greater decrease of wind speed. Increasing the depth of the hedge had the greatest effect on particle collection with 42.4% for dp = 15 μm, more effective than increasing the height or LSAD. Adding another row of hedge also increased the capability of the hedge in wind speed reduction and particle collection, while row spacing did not show great effect. The increasing rate of mean CE by adding a hedgerow was less than that by increasing hedge size, which more than double the CE of particles with diameter greater than 4.25 μm. Field measurements and additional simulation tests need to be conducted under different conditions for model validation.
AB - Previous research has shown that particulate matter (PM) in the air can be captured by vegetative barriers (VB) serving as shelter against the wind; however, there is only limited research of factors affecting their efficiency. This study used computational fluid dynamics to predict particle collection efficiency (CE) of VBs, as affected by hedge geometry (i.e., the size expressed in terms of height, depth, and leaf surface area density [LSAD]) and the number of hedgerows. The experimental data of Tiwary et al. (Journal of Aerosol Science, 2005) were used for model parametrisation. The area of wind speed reduction, protection area and mean collection efficiency were defined and calculated to evaluate the effectiveness of VBs on sheltering function and particle collection. Simulation results predicted that compared with original size, increasing the height and LSAD of the hedge resulted in a greater decrease of wind speed. Increasing the depth of the hedge had the greatest effect on particle collection with 42.4% for dp = 15 μm, more effective than increasing the height or LSAD. Adding another row of hedge also increased the capability of the hedge in wind speed reduction and particle collection, while row spacing did not show great effect. The increasing rate of mean CE by adding a hedgerow was less than that by increasing hedge size, which more than double the CE of particles with diameter greater than 4.25 μm. Field measurements and additional simulation tests need to be conducted under different conditions for model validation.
KW - Collection efficiency
KW - Computational fluid dynamics
KW - Particulate matter
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85070693199&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85070693199&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2019.07.008
DO - 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2019.07.008
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85070693199
SN - 1537-5110
VL - 186
SP - 182
EP - 194
JO - Biosystems Engineering
JF - Biosystems Engineering
ER -