TY - JOUR
T1 - A new approach to differentiate states of mind wandering
T2 - Effects of working memory capacity
AU - Voss, Matthew J.
AU - Zukosky, Meera
AU - Wang, Ranxiao Frances
N1 - Funding Information:
We would like to especially thank Mike Kane, Paul Seli, Jonathan Smallwood, Dan Simons, and David Irwin for discussion of the findings, and Sophia Dumlao, Dashiell Koester, Jackin Feng Sheh, Heidi Soon, and Faith Tan with help with data collection. This project was funded in part by the National Science Foundation grant # 1519407 . Comments should be sent to Meera Zukosky (email: zukosky1@illinois.edu ).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018
PY - 2018/10
Y1 - 2018/10
N2 - Although widely studied, the process of how mind wandering occurs and is subsequently sustained still remains unclear. Moreover, the traditional concept of mind wandering tendency/frequency based on the self- or probe-caught methods alone is incoherent and problematic. We developed a new approach to characterize the mind wandering process by combining the self-caught and probe-caught methods to estimate the time of focus and time of mind wandering separately, and examined their relationship to working memory capacity. Participants performed an OSPAN task and subsequently a basic Mindfulness Meditation Task (focus on breath). During the meditation task, participants indicated when they became aware that they were mind wandering (self-caught method), or were asked if they were mind wandering when probed (probe-caught method). Results showed that time of focus but not time of mind wandering increased with greater working memory capacity. This suggests that individuals with higher working memory capacity were able to focus on the current task longer, but had little effect on the ability to monitor and terminate mind wandering once it occurred. The theoretical and methodological implications of this new approach are discussed.
AB - Although widely studied, the process of how mind wandering occurs and is subsequently sustained still remains unclear. Moreover, the traditional concept of mind wandering tendency/frequency based on the self- or probe-caught methods alone is incoherent and problematic. We developed a new approach to characterize the mind wandering process by combining the self-caught and probe-caught methods to estimate the time of focus and time of mind wandering separately, and examined their relationship to working memory capacity. Participants performed an OSPAN task and subsequently a basic Mindfulness Meditation Task (focus on breath). During the meditation task, participants indicated when they became aware that they were mind wandering (self-caught method), or were asked if they were mind wandering when probed (probe-caught method). Results showed that time of focus but not time of mind wandering increased with greater working memory capacity. This suggests that individuals with higher working memory capacity were able to focus on the current task longer, but had little effect on the ability to monitor and terminate mind wandering once it occurred. The theoretical and methodological implications of this new approach are discussed.
KW - Meditation
KW - Memory and attention
KW - Mind wandering
KW - Working memory
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049312633&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85049312633&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.05.013
DO - 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.05.013
M3 - Article
C2 - 29966913
AN - SCOPUS:85049312633
SN - 0010-0277
VL - 179
SP - 202
EP - 212
JO - Cognition
JF - Cognition
ER -