A multilevel analysis of diverse learners playing life science video games: Interactions between game content, learning disability status, reading proficiency, and gender

Maya Israel, Shuai Wang, Matthew T. Marino

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Extant research reports differential effects related to the efficacy of video games as a means to enhance science instruction. However, there are very few studies examining differences in learning outcomes across student-level independent variables. This study used multilevel modeling to examine the effects of three video game-enhanced life science units on the performance of 366 adolescent students from three middle schools in the central and western United States. The study included 18 life science classrooms that were taught by four teachers over a 6-week period. Independent variables included the students' National Assessment of Educational Progress reading level, presence of a learning disability, gender, and student perceptions of science and video games. Struggling readers and students with low perceptions of their skills as scientists underperformed when compared to their peers. Results across all games indicated significant learning gains for students with and without learning disabilities. Learning disability, gender, and perceptions of video games for learning were not significant predictors of student performance. Results from the study indicate that the effects of video games on science learning are mediated by individual learner characteristics and the science content.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)324-345
Number of pages22
JournalJournal of Research in Science Teaching
Volume53
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2016

Keywords

  • gender
  • life science
  • struggling readers
  • students with disabilities
  • video games

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A multilevel analysis of diverse learners playing life science video games: Interactions between game content, learning disability status, reading proficiency, and gender'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this