A macrophysiology approach to watershed science and management

Robert J. Lennox, Cory D. Suski, Steven J. Cooke

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

Abstract

Freshwaters are among the most imperiled ecosystems on the planet such that much effort is expended on environmental monitoring to support the management of these systems. Many traditional monitoring efforts focus on abiotic characterization of water quantity or quality and/or indices of biotic integrity that focus on higher scale population or community level metrics such as abundance or diversity. However, these indicators may take time to manifest in degraded systems and delay the identification and restoration of these systems. Physiological indicators manifest rapidly and portend oncoming changes in populations that can hasten restoration and facilitate preventative medicine for degraded habitats. Therefore, assessing freshwater ecosystem integrity using physiological indicators of health is a promising tool to improve freshwater monitoring and restoration. Here, we discuss the value of using comparative, longitudinal physiological data collected at a broad spatial (i.e. watershed) scale (i.e. macrophysiology) as a tool for monitoring aquatic ecosystem health within and among local watersheds to develop timely and effective management plans. There are emerging tools and techniques available for rapid, cost-effective, and non-lethal physiological sampling and we discuss how these can be integrated into management using fish as sentinel indicators in freshwater. Although many examples of this approach are relatively recent, we foresee increasing use of macrophysiology in monitoring, and advocate for the development of more standard tools for consistent and reliable assessment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)434-440
Number of pages7
JournalScience of the Total Environment
Volume626
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2018

Fingerprint

Watersheds
watershed
Monitoring
Restoration
monitoring
Ecosystems
Index of Biotic Integrity
Health
ecosystem health
freshwater ecosystem
environmental monitoring
Aquatic ecosystems
medicine
aquatic ecosystem
Planets
planet
Fish
Medicine
science
indicator

Keywords

  • Biomarker
  • Environmental assessment
  • Fish assemblage
  • Individual-based monitoring
  • Physiology
  • Restoration

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Engineering
  • Environmental Chemistry
  • Waste Management and Disposal
  • Pollution

Cite this

A macrophysiology approach to watershed science and management. / Lennox, Robert J.; Suski, Cory D.; Cooke, Steven J.

In: Science of the Total Environment, Vol. 626, 01.06.2018, p. 434-440.

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

Lennox, Robert J. ; Suski, Cory D. ; Cooke, Steven J. / A macrophysiology approach to watershed science and management. In: Science of the Total Environment. 2018 ; Vol. 626. pp. 434-440.
@article{5b1f86f8571640d8b60f83bab23fa9f9,
title = "A macrophysiology approach to watershed science and management",
abstract = "Freshwaters are among the most imperiled ecosystems on the planet such that much effort is expended on environmental monitoring to support the management of these systems. Many traditional monitoring efforts focus on abiotic characterization of water quantity or quality and/or indices of biotic integrity that focus on higher scale population or community level metrics such as abundance or diversity. However, these indicators may take time to manifest in degraded systems and delay the identification and restoration of these systems. Physiological indicators manifest rapidly and portend oncoming changes in populations that can hasten restoration and facilitate preventative medicine for degraded habitats. Therefore, assessing freshwater ecosystem integrity using physiological indicators of health is a promising tool to improve freshwater monitoring and restoration. Here, we discuss the value of using comparative, longitudinal physiological data collected at a broad spatial (i.e. watershed) scale (i.e. macrophysiology) as a tool for monitoring aquatic ecosystem health within and among local watersheds to develop timely and effective management plans. There are emerging tools and techniques available for rapid, cost-effective, and non-lethal physiological sampling and we discuss how these can be integrated into management using fish as sentinel indicators in freshwater. Although many examples of this approach are relatively recent, we foresee increasing use of macrophysiology in monitoring, and advocate for the development of more standard tools for consistent and reliable assessment.",
keywords = "Biomarker, Environmental assessment, Fish assemblage, Individual-based monitoring, Physiology, Restoration",
author = "Lennox, {Robert J.} and Suski, {Cory D.} and Cooke, {Steven J.}",
year = "2018",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.069",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "626",
pages = "434--440",
journal = "Science of the Total Environment",
issn = "0048-9697",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A macrophysiology approach to watershed science and management

AU - Lennox, Robert J.

AU - Suski, Cory D.

AU - Cooke, Steven J.

PY - 2018/6/1

Y1 - 2018/6/1

N2 - Freshwaters are among the most imperiled ecosystems on the planet such that much effort is expended on environmental monitoring to support the management of these systems. Many traditional monitoring efforts focus on abiotic characterization of water quantity or quality and/or indices of biotic integrity that focus on higher scale population or community level metrics such as abundance or diversity. However, these indicators may take time to manifest in degraded systems and delay the identification and restoration of these systems. Physiological indicators manifest rapidly and portend oncoming changes in populations that can hasten restoration and facilitate preventative medicine for degraded habitats. Therefore, assessing freshwater ecosystem integrity using physiological indicators of health is a promising tool to improve freshwater monitoring and restoration. Here, we discuss the value of using comparative, longitudinal physiological data collected at a broad spatial (i.e. watershed) scale (i.e. macrophysiology) as a tool for monitoring aquatic ecosystem health within and among local watersheds to develop timely and effective management plans. There are emerging tools and techniques available for rapid, cost-effective, and non-lethal physiological sampling and we discuss how these can be integrated into management using fish as sentinel indicators in freshwater. Although many examples of this approach are relatively recent, we foresee increasing use of macrophysiology in monitoring, and advocate for the development of more standard tools for consistent and reliable assessment.

AB - Freshwaters are among the most imperiled ecosystems on the planet such that much effort is expended on environmental monitoring to support the management of these systems. Many traditional monitoring efforts focus on abiotic characterization of water quantity or quality and/or indices of biotic integrity that focus on higher scale population or community level metrics such as abundance or diversity. However, these indicators may take time to manifest in degraded systems and delay the identification and restoration of these systems. Physiological indicators manifest rapidly and portend oncoming changes in populations that can hasten restoration and facilitate preventative medicine for degraded habitats. Therefore, assessing freshwater ecosystem integrity using physiological indicators of health is a promising tool to improve freshwater monitoring and restoration. Here, we discuss the value of using comparative, longitudinal physiological data collected at a broad spatial (i.e. watershed) scale (i.e. macrophysiology) as a tool for monitoring aquatic ecosystem health within and among local watersheds to develop timely and effective management plans. There are emerging tools and techniques available for rapid, cost-effective, and non-lethal physiological sampling and we discuss how these can be integrated into management using fish as sentinel indicators in freshwater. Although many examples of this approach are relatively recent, we foresee increasing use of macrophysiology in monitoring, and advocate for the development of more standard tools for consistent and reliable assessment.

KW - Biomarker

KW - Environmental assessment

KW - Fish assemblage

KW - Individual-based monitoring

KW - Physiology

KW - Restoration

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042912361&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85042912361&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.069

DO - 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.069

M3 - Comment/debate

C2 - 29353786

AN - SCOPUS:85042912361

VL - 626

SP - 434

EP - 440

JO - Science of the Total Environment

JF - Science of the Total Environment

SN - 0048-9697

ER -