TY - JOUR
T1 - A macroergonomic analysis to identify improvements to postpartum hemorrhage anticipation, identification, and management
AU - Hale-Lopez, Kaitlyn L.
AU - Saenz, Madelyn M.
AU - Verma, Neelam
AU - Chakravarthy, Shruti
AU - Handler, Jonathan
AU - Ebert-Allen, Rebecca
AU - Bond, William F.
AU - Wooldridge, Abigail R.
N1 - This work was supported by the Jump Applied Research for Community Health through Engineering and Simulation endowment through the Health Care Engineering Systems Center (Grant # P363).
Conflict of interest: J.H. declares the following conflicts of interest: recipient of research funding and writing support from Pfizer; stockholder in Baxter Healthcare; advisor and stockholder for EmOpt, Whispersom, and HealthLab; and shareholder and officer of Keylog Solutions LLC.
Thank you to our study participants, as our research would not be possible without them. This work was supported by the Jump Applied Research for Community Health through Engineering and Simulation endowment through the Health Care Engineering Systems Center (Grant # P363).
PY - 2025/7/1
Y1 - 2025/7/1
N2 - Background: Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) remains a leading cause of maternal mortality despite the development of interventions to optimize the diagnosis and management. In this study, we used models and methods from macroergonomics to understand why PPH remains a leading cause of maternal mortality. Specifically, we used the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety (SEIPS) model to explore how the work system during the anticipation, identification, and management of PPH can be redesigned to improve patient safety. Methods: We performed 26 observations of direct patient care, totaling 37 h and 36 min, to understand the care processes during the anticipation, identification, and management of PPH. We used the SEIPS-based process modeling method to visualize the care processes. Additionally, we conducted interviews and focus groups with 29 clinicians to understand the positive and negative factors that impact patient safety. We analyzed the interview and focus group transcripts using thematic content analysis to identify the positive and negative factors. Results: We developed a SEIPS-based process map of the anticipation, identification, and management care processes during a cesarean-section delivery and a vaginal delivery. Additionally, we identified 753 factors that positively or negatively impact the quality of care during the anticipation, identification, and management of PPH. We categorized these factors into 13 dimensions—role ambiguity, anticipation, physical environment, staffing, resources/equipment, tools and technology, communication, coordination, cooperation, tacit knowledge, time pressure, leadership, and training. Conclusion: Our findings resulted in four system design considerations to improve patient safety: assigning the coordination of clinicians and resources as a job function, integrating point-of-care tools, improving the lighting in the patient rooms, and redesigning the PPH risk assessment tool to support the anticipation, identification, and management of PPH.
AB - Background: Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) remains a leading cause of maternal mortality despite the development of interventions to optimize the diagnosis and management. In this study, we used models and methods from macroergonomics to understand why PPH remains a leading cause of maternal mortality. Specifically, we used the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety (SEIPS) model to explore how the work system during the anticipation, identification, and management of PPH can be redesigned to improve patient safety. Methods: We performed 26 observations of direct patient care, totaling 37 h and 36 min, to understand the care processes during the anticipation, identification, and management of PPH. We used the SEIPS-based process modeling method to visualize the care processes. Additionally, we conducted interviews and focus groups with 29 clinicians to understand the positive and negative factors that impact patient safety. We analyzed the interview and focus group transcripts using thematic content analysis to identify the positive and negative factors. Results: We developed a SEIPS-based process map of the anticipation, identification, and management care processes during a cesarean-section delivery and a vaginal delivery. Additionally, we identified 753 factors that positively or negatively impact the quality of care during the anticipation, identification, and management of PPH. We categorized these factors into 13 dimensions—role ambiguity, anticipation, physical environment, staffing, resources/equipment, tools and technology, communication, coordination, cooperation, tacit knowledge, time pressure, leadership, and training. Conclusion: Our findings resulted in four system design considerations to improve patient safety: assigning the coordination of clinicians and resources as a job function, integrating point-of-care tools, improving the lighting in the patient rooms, and redesigning the PPH risk assessment tool to support the anticipation, identification, and management of PPH.
KW - human factors and ergonomics
KW - patient safety
KW - postpartum hemorrhage
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105013205595
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105013205595#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1093/intqhc/mzaf063
DO - 10.1093/intqhc/mzaf063
M3 - Article
C2 - 40705443
AN - SCOPUS:105013205595
SN - 1353-4505
VL - 37
JO - International Journal for Quality in Health Care
JF - International Journal for Quality in Health Care
IS - 3
M1 - mzaf063
ER -