“A Lot of It Really Does Come Down to Values”: An Empirical Study of the Values Advanced by Seasoned Evaluators

Rebecca M. Teasdale, Jennifer R. McNeilly, Maria Isabel Ramírez Garzón, Judit Novak, Jennifer C. Greene

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This study challenges persistent misrepresentations of evaluation as a value-neutral inquiry process by presenting an empirical study that deepens understanding of evaluators’ values and how they “show up” in evaluation practice. Through semistructured interviews and inductive analysis, we examined the values advanced by a sample of eight experienced evaluators. We surfaced and examined 12 values, which we organized into five clusters, that shaped the constitutive elements of the studies these evaluators conducted and guided how the evaluators positioned their work. Our findings provide empirical evidence about the role of values in evaluation practice and can support evaluators in reflecting on their own values and enacting their professional and ethical responsibilities to identify and articulate their values in the context of evaluation practice.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)453-473
Number of pages21
JournalAmerican Journal of Evaluation
Volume44
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2023

Keywords

  • evaluation practice
  • research on evaluation
  • values
  • values engagement

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business and International Management
  • Social Psychology
  • Health(social science)
  • Education
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Strategy and Management

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '“A Lot of It Really Does Come Down to Values”: An Empirical Study of the Values Advanced by Seasoned Evaluators'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this