A Kantian critique of the care tradition: Family law and systemic justice

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Liberal theories of justice have been rightly criticized for two things by care theorists. First, they have failed to deal with private care relations' inherent (inter)dependency, asymmetry and particularity. Second, they have been shown unable properly to address the asymmetry and dependency constitutive of care workers' and care-receivers' systemic conditions. I apply Kant's theory of right to show that current care theories unfortunately reproduce similar problems because they also argue on the assumption that good care requires only virtuous private individuals. Giving up this assumption enables us to solve the problems regarding both private care relations and systemic injustice.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)327-356
Number of pages30
JournalKantian Review
Volume17
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2012

Fingerprint

Family Law
Justice
Asymmetry
Interdependencies
Particularity
Theory of Justice
Workers
Injustice
Immanuel Kant
Theorists

Keywords

  • Care relations
  • Kant's doctrine of right
  • Private right
  • Public right

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Philosophy

Cite this

A Kantian critique of the care tradition : Family law and systemic justice. / Varden, Helga.

In: Kantian Review, Vol. 17, No. 2, 01.07.2012, p. 327-356.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3c4587a2eeae4cc3a97588f1b6b45522,
title = "A Kantian critique of the care tradition: Family law and systemic justice",
abstract = "Liberal theories of justice have been rightly criticized for two things by care theorists. First, they have failed to deal with private care relations' inherent (inter)dependency, asymmetry and particularity. Second, they have been shown unable properly to address the asymmetry and dependency constitutive of care workers' and care-receivers' systemic conditions. I apply Kant's theory of right to show that current care theories unfortunately reproduce similar problems because they also argue on the assumption that good care requires only virtuous private individuals. Giving up this assumption enables us to solve the problems regarding both private care relations and systemic injustice.",
keywords = "Care relations, Kant's doctrine of right, Private right, Public right",
author = "Helga Varden",
year = "2012",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/S1369415412000088",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "327--356",
journal = "Kantian Review",
issn = "1369-4154",
publisher = "University of Wales Press",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Kantian critique of the care tradition

T2 - Family law and systemic justice

AU - Varden, Helga

PY - 2012/7/1

Y1 - 2012/7/1

N2 - Liberal theories of justice have been rightly criticized for two things by care theorists. First, they have failed to deal with private care relations' inherent (inter)dependency, asymmetry and particularity. Second, they have been shown unable properly to address the asymmetry and dependency constitutive of care workers' and care-receivers' systemic conditions. I apply Kant's theory of right to show that current care theories unfortunately reproduce similar problems because they also argue on the assumption that good care requires only virtuous private individuals. Giving up this assumption enables us to solve the problems regarding both private care relations and systemic injustice.

AB - Liberal theories of justice have been rightly criticized for two things by care theorists. First, they have failed to deal with private care relations' inherent (inter)dependency, asymmetry and particularity. Second, they have been shown unable properly to address the asymmetry and dependency constitutive of care workers' and care-receivers' systemic conditions. I apply Kant's theory of right to show that current care theories unfortunately reproduce similar problems because they also argue on the assumption that good care requires only virtuous private individuals. Giving up this assumption enables us to solve the problems regarding both private care relations and systemic injustice.

KW - Care relations

KW - Kant's doctrine of right

KW - Private right

KW - Public right

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84863628869&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84863628869&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S1369415412000088

DO - 10.1017/S1369415412000088

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84863628869

VL - 17

SP - 327

EP - 356

JO - Kantian Review

JF - Kantian Review

SN - 1369-4154

IS - 2

ER -