A Kantian Conception of Rightful Sexual Relations: Sex, (Gay) Marriage, and Prostitution

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This paper defends a legal and political conception of sexual relations grounded in Kant's Doctrine of Right. First, I argue that only a lack of consent can make a sexual deed wrong in the legal sense. Second, I demonstrate why all other legal constraints on sexual practices in a just society are legal constraints on seemingly unrelated public institutions. I explain the way in which the just state acts as a civil guardian for domestic relations and as a civil guarantor for private property and contract relations-and thereby enables the existence of legally enforceable claims. Throughout the aim is to demonstrate that Kant's relational conception of justice entails that legally enforceable claims regarding sexual deeds are fully justifiable only insofar as they are determined and enforced by a public authority that we may refer to as a liberal democratic welfare state.
Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)199-218
Number of pages20
JournalSocial Philosophy Today
Volume22
DOIs
StatePublished - 2006

Fingerprint

prostitution
marriage
private property
public authorities
public institution
welfare state
doctrine
justice
lack
Society

Keywords

  • HUMAN sexuality & law
  • SEX customs
  • PUBLIC institutions
  • DOMESTIC relations
  • PERSONAL property
  • JUSTICE (Virtue)
  • WELFARE state

Cite this

A Kantian Conception of Rightful Sexual Relations : Sex, (Gay) Marriage, and Prostitution. / Varden, Helga.

In: Social Philosophy Today, Vol. 22, 2006, p. 199-218.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e887ceb2cb9243eda4b7351fb467f0b5,
title = "A Kantian Conception of Rightful Sexual Relations: Sex, (Gay) Marriage, and Prostitution",
abstract = "This paper defends a legal and political conception of sexual relations grounded in Kant's Doctrine of Right. First, I argue that only a lack of consent can make a sexual deed wrong in the legal sense. Second, I demonstrate why all other legal constraints on sexual practices in a just society are legal constraints on seemingly unrelated public institutions. I explain the way in which the just state acts as a civil guardian for domestic relations and as a civil guarantor for private property and contract relations-and thereby enables the existence of legally enforceable claims. Throughout the aim is to demonstrate that Kant's relational conception of justice entails that legally enforceable claims regarding sexual deeds are fully justifiable only insofar as they are determined and enforced by a public authority that we may refer to as a liberal democratic welfare state.",
keywords = "HUMAN sexuality & law, SEX customs, PUBLIC institutions, DOMESTIC relations, PERSONAL property, JUSTICE (Virtue), WELFARE state",
author = "Helga Varden",
year = "2006",
doi = "10.5840/socphiltoday20062220",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "199--218",
journal = "Social Philosophy Today",
issn = "1543-4044",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Kantian Conception of Rightful Sexual Relations

T2 - Sex, (Gay) Marriage, and Prostitution

AU - Varden, Helga

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - This paper defends a legal and political conception of sexual relations grounded in Kant's Doctrine of Right. First, I argue that only a lack of consent can make a sexual deed wrong in the legal sense. Second, I demonstrate why all other legal constraints on sexual practices in a just society are legal constraints on seemingly unrelated public institutions. I explain the way in which the just state acts as a civil guardian for domestic relations and as a civil guarantor for private property and contract relations-and thereby enables the existence of legally enforceable claims. Throughout the aim is to demonstrate that Kant's relational conception of justice entails that legally enforceable claims regarding sexual deeds are fully justifiable only insofar as they are determined and enforced by a public authority that we may refer to as a liberal democratic welfare state.

AB - This paper defends a legal and political conception of sexual relations grounded in Kant's Doctrine of Right. First, I argue that only a lack of consent can make a sexual deed wrong in the legal sense. Second, I demonstrate why all other legal constraints on sexual practices in a just society are legal constraints on seemingly unrelated public institutions. I explain the way in which the just state acts as a civil guardian for domestic relations and as a civil guarantor for private property and contract relations-and thereby enables the existence of legally enforceable claims. Throughout the aim is to demonstrate that Kant's relational conception of justice entails that legally enforceable claims regarding sexual deeds are fully justifiable only insofar as they are determined and enforced by a public authority that we may refer to as a liberal democratic welfare state.

KW - HUMAN sexuality & law

KW - SEX customs

KW - PUBLIC institutions

KW - DOMESTIC relations

KW - PERSONAL property

KW - JUSTICE (Virtue)

KW - WELFARE state

U2 - 10.5840/socphiltoday20062220

DO - 10.5840/socphiltoday20062220

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 199

EP - 218

JO - Social Philosophy Today

JF - Social Philosophy Today

SN - 1543-4044

ER -