Abstract
For the past decade, humanists and social scientists have responded to what some have experienced as an encroaching neuro-presence: the proliferation of neuro-disciplines, the adoption of brain-centrism that has accompanied an explanatory shift from gene to neuron, and the media machine dedicated to all things "neuro-." At the same time, neuroscientists have been reacting to hyperbolic media representations and potentially dubious scientific studies (often grouped under a rubric of pop neuroscience). In this chapter, I explore how the effects of the "neuro-" (and even the "neuro-turn") have been imagined for the neurosciences, and I analyze why the neurosciences are discursively-if not realistically-endangered by the "neuro-." I focus on two examples: the 2012-13 backlash against pop neuroscience, and the EU's Human Brain Project. In closing, I theorize some of the stakes for both the neurosciences and the neuro-turn: these include problems of translation, reputation, and marketability.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Title of host publication | The Human Sciences after the Decade of the Brain |
Editors | Jon Leefmann, Elisabeth Hildt |
Publisher | Elsevier Inc. |
Pages | 198-213 |
Number of pages | 16 |
ISBN (Electronic) | 9780128042601 |
ISBN (Print) | 9780128042052 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Feb 13 2017 |
Keywords
- Backlash
- Human Brain Project
- Mind Plague
- Neuromania
- Neuroscience
- Neuroscientific turn
- Neuroturn
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Neuroscience