"A Mind Plague on Both Your Houses"

Imagining the Impact of the Neuro-Turn on the Neurosciences

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

For the past decade, humanists and social scientists have responded to what some have experienced as an encroaching neuro-presence: the proliferation of neuro-disciplines, the adoption of brain-centrism that has accompanied an explanatory shift from gene to neuron, and the media machine dedicated to all things "neuro-." At the same time, neuroscientists have been reacting to hyperbolic media representations and potentially dubious scientific studies (often grouped under a rubric of pop neuroscience). In this chapter, I explore how the effects of the "neuro-" (and even the "neuro-turn") have been imagined for the neurosciences, and I analyze why the neurosciences are discursively-if not realistically-endangered by the "neuro-." I focus on two examples: the 2012-13 backlash against pop neuroscience, and the EU's Human Brain Project. In closing, I theorize some of the stakes for both the neurosciences and the neuro-turn: these include problems of translation, reputation, and marketability.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationThe Human Sciences after the Decade of the Brain
EditorsJon Leefmann, Elisabeth Hildt
PublisherElsevier Inc.
Pages198-213
Number of pages16
ISBN (Electronic)9780128042601
ISBN (Print)9780128042052
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 13 2017

Fingerprint

Plague
Neurosciences
Brain
Neurons
Genes

Keywords

  • Backlash
  • Human Brain Project
  • Mind Plague
  • Neuromania
  • Neuroscience
  • Neuroscientific turn
  • Neuroturn

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Littlefield, M. M. (2017). "A Mind Plague on Both Your Houses": Imagining the Impact of the Neuro-Turn on the Neurosciences. In J. Leefmann, & E. Hildt (Eds.), The Human Sciences after the Decade of the Brain (pp. 198-213). Elsevier Inc.. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-804205-2.00012-4

"A Mind Plague on Both Your Houses" : Imagining the Impact of the Neuro-Turn on the Neurosciences. / Littlefield, Melissa Monique.

The Human Sciences after the Decade of the Brain. ed. / Jon Leefmann; Elisabeth Hildt. Elsevier Inc., 2017. p. 198-213.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Littlefield, MM 2017, "A Mind Plague on Both Your Houses": Imagining the Impact of the Neuro-Turn on the Neurosciences. in J Leefmann & E Hildt (eds), The Human Sciences after the Decade of the Brain. Elsevier Inc., pp. 198-213. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-804205-2.00012-4
Littlefield MM. "A Mind Plague on Both Your Houses": Imagining the Impact of the Neuro-Turn on the Neurosciences. In Leefmann J, Hildt E, editors, The Human Sciences after the Decade of the Brain. Elsevier Inc. 2017. p. 198-213 https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-804205-2.00012-4
Littlefield, Melissa Monique. / "A Mind Plague on Both Your Houses" : Imagining the Impact of the Neuro-Turn on the Neurosciences. The Human Sciences after the Decade of the Brain. editor / Jon Leefmann ; Elisabeth Hildt. Elsevier Inc., 2017. pp. 198-213
@inbook{965196e37557491c959ea6b34103783a,
title = "{"}A Mind Plague on Both Your Houses{"}: Imagining the Impact of the Neuro-Turn on the Neurosciences",
abstract = "For the past decade, humanists and social scientists have responded to what some have experienced as an encroaching neuro-presence: the proliferation of neuro-disciplines, the adoption of brain-centrism that has accompanied an explanatory shift from gene to neuron, and the media machine dedicated to all things {"}neuro-.{"} At the same time, neuroscientists have been reacting to hyperbolic media representations and potentially dubious scientific studies (often grouped under a rubric of pop neuroscience). In this chapter, I explore how the effects of the {"}neuro-{"} (and even the {"}neuro-turn{"}) have been imagined for the neurosciences, and I analyze why the neurosciences are discursively-if not realistically-endangered by the {"}neuro-.{"} I focus on two examples: the 2012-13 backlash against pop neuroscience, and the EU's Human Brain Project. In closing, I theorize some of the stakes for both the neurosciences and the neuro-turn: these include problems of translation, reputation, and marketability.",
keywords = "Backlash, Human Brain Project, Mind Plague, Neuromania, Neuroscience, Neuroscientific turn, Neuroturn",
author = "Littlefield, {Melissa Monique}",
year = "2017",
month = "2",
day = "13",
doi = "10.1016/B978-0-12-804205-2.00012-4",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780128042052",
pages = "198--213",
editor = "Jon Leefmann and Elisabeth Hildt",
booktitle = "The Human Sciences after the Decade of the Brain",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - "A Mind Plague on Both Your Houses"

T2 - Imagining the Impact of the Neuro-Turn on the Neurosciences

AU - Littlefield, Melissa Monique

PY - 2017/2/13

Y1 - 2017/2/13

N2 - For the past decade, humanists and social scientists have responded to what some have experienced as an encroaching neuro-presence: the proliferation of neuro-disciplines, the adoption of brain-centrism that has accompanied an explanatory shift from gene to neuron, and the media machine dedicated to all things "neuro-." At the same time, neuroscientists have been reacting to hyperbolic media representations and potentially dubious scientific studies (often grouped under a rubric of pop neuroscience). In this chapter, I explore how the effects of the "neuro-" (and even the "neuro-turn") have been imagined for the neurosciences, and I analyze why the neurosciences are discursively-if not realistically-endangered by the "neuro-." I focus on two examples: the 2012-13 backlash against pop neuroscience, and the EU's Human Brain Project. In closing, I theorize some of the stakes for both the neurosciences and the neuro-turn: these include problems of translation, reputation, and marketability.

AB - For the past decade, humanists and social scientists have responded to what some have experienced as an encroaching neuro-presence: the proliferation of neuro-disciplines, the adoption of brain-centrism that has accompanied an explanatory shift from gene to neuron, and the media machine dedicated to all things "neuro-." At the same time, neuroscientists have been reacting to hyperbolic media representations and potentially dubious scientific studies (often grouped under a rubric of pop neuroscience). In this chapter, I explore how the effects of the "neuro-" (and even the "neuro-turn") have been imagined for the neurosciences, and I analyze why the neurosciences are discursively-if not realistically-endangered by the "neuro-." I focus on two examples: the 2012-13 backlash against pop neuroscience, and the EU's Human Brain Project. In closing, I theorize some of the stakes for both the neurosciences and the neuro-turn: these include problems of translation, reputation, and marketability.

KW - Backlash

KW - Human Brain Project

KW - Mind Plague

KW - Neuromania

KW - Neuroscience

KW - Neuroscientific turn

KW - Neuroturn

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85020819703&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85020819703&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/B978-0-12-804205-2.00012-4

DO - 10.1016/B978-0-12-804205-2.00012-4

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9780128042052

SP - 198

EP - 213

BT - The Human Sciences after the Decade of the Brain

A2 - Leefmann, Jon

A2 - Hildt, Elisabeth

PB - Elsevier Inc.

ER -