A Hybrid Eulerian-Eulerian Discrete-Phase Model of Turbulent Bubbly Flow

Hyunjin Yang, Surya Pratap Vanka, Brian G. Thomas

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The Eulerian-Eulerian two-fluid model (EE) is a powerful general model for multiphase flow computations. However, one limitation of the EE model is that it has no ability to estimate the local bubble sizes by itself. In this work, we have combined the discrete phase model (DPM) to estimate the evolution of bubble sizes with the EE model. In the DPM, the change of bubble size distribution is estimated by coalescence, breakup, and volumetric expansion modeling of the bubbles. The time-varying bubble distribution is used to compute the local interface area between gas and liquid phase, which is then used to estimate the momentum interactions such as drag, lift, wall lubrication, and turbulent dispersion forces for the EE model. In this work, this newly developed hybrid model Eulerian-Eulerian discrete-phase model (EEDPM) is applied to compute an upward flowing bubbly flow in a vertical pipe and the results are compared with previous experimental work of Hibiki et al. (2001, "Axial Interfacial Area Transport of Vertical Bubbly Flows," Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 44(10), pp. 1869-1888). The EEDPM model is able to reasonably predict the locally different bubble size distributions and the velocity and gas fraction fields. On the other hand, the standard EE model without the DPM shows good comparison with measurements only when the prescribed constant initial bubble size is accurate and does not change much. Parametric studies are implemented to understand the contributions of bubble interactions and volumetric expansion on the size change of bubbles quantitatively. The results show that coalescence is larger than other effects, and naturally increases in importance with increasing gas fraction.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number101202
JournalJournal of Fluids Engineering, Transactions of the ASME
Volume140
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2018

Fingerprint

Turbulent flow
Coalescence
Gases
Multiphase flow
Lubrication
Drag
Momentum
Mass transfer
Pipe

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Mechanical Engineering

Cite this

A Hybrid Eulerian-Eulerian Discrete-Phase Model of Turbulent Bubbly Flow. / Yang, Hyunjin; Vanka, Surya Pratap; Thomas, Brian G.

In: Journal of Fluids Engineering, Transactions of the ASME, Vol. 140, No. 10, 101202, 01.10.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{09128a83b88f4762923139c528700192,
title = "A Hybrid Eulerian-Eulerian Discrete-Phase Model of Turbulent Bubbly Flow",
abstract = "The Eulerian-Eulerian two-fluid model (EE) is a powerful general model for multiphase flow computations. However, one limitation of the EE model is that it has no ability to estimate the local bubble sizes by itself. In this work, we have combined the discrete phase model (DPM) to estimate the evolution of bubble sizes with the EE model. In the DPM, the change of bubble size distribution is estimated by coalescence, breakup, and volumetric expansion modeling of the bubbles. The time-varying bubble distribution is used to compute the local interface area between gas and liquid phase, which is then used to estimate the momentum interactions such as drag, lift, wall lubrication, and turbulent dispersion forces for the EE model. In this work, this newly developed hybrid model Eulerian-Eulerian discrete-phase model (EEDPM) is applied to compute an upward flowing bubbly flow in a vertical pipe and the results are compared with previous experimental work of Hibiki et al. (2001, {"}Axial Interfacial Area Transport of Vertical Bubbly Flows,{"} Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 44(10), pp. 1869-1888). The EEDPM model is able to reasonably predict the locally different bubble size distributions and the velocity and gas fraction fields. On the other hand, the standard EE model without the DPM shows good comparison with measurements only when the prescribed constant initial bubble size is accurate and does not change much. Parametric studies are implemented to understand the contributions of bubble interactions and volumetric expansion on the size change of bubbles quantitatively. The results show that coalescence is larger than other effects, and naturally increases in importance with increasing gas fraction.",
author = "Hyunjin Yang and Vanka, {Surya Pratap} and Thomas, {Brian G.}",
year = "2018",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1115/1.4039793",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "140",
journal = "Journal of Fluids Engineering, Transactions of the ASME",
issn = "0098-2202",
publisher = "American Society of Mechanical Engineers(ASME)",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Hybrid Eulerian-Eulerian Discrete-Phase Model of Turbulent Bubbly Flow

AU - Yang, Hyunjin

AU - Vanka, Surya Pratap

AU - Thomas, Brian G.

PY - 2018/10/1

Y1 - 2018/10/1

N2 - The Eulerian-Eulerian two-fluid model (EE) is a powerful general model for multiphase flow computations. However, one limitation of the EE model is that it has no ability to estimate the local bubble sizes by itself. In this work, we have combined the discrete phase model (DPM) to estimate the evolution of bubble sizes with the EE model. In the DPM, the change of bubble size distribution is estimated by coalescence, breakup, and volumetric expansion modeling of the bubbles. The time-varying bubble distribution is used to compute the local interface area between gas and liquid phase, which is then used to estimate the momentum interactions such as drag, lift, wall lubrication, and turbulent dispersion forces for the EE model. In this work, this newly developed hybrid model Eulerian-Eulerian discrete-phase model (EEDPM) is applied to compute an upward flowing bubbly flow in a vertical pipe and the results are compared with previous experimental work of Hibiki et al. (2001, "Axial Interfacial Area Transport of Vertical Bubbly Flows," Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 44(10), pp. 1869-1888). The EEDPM model is able to reasonably predict the locally different bubble size distributions and the velocity and gas fraction fields. On the other hand, the standard EE model without the DPM shows good comparison with measurements only when the prescribed constant initial bubble size is accurate and does not change much. Parametric studies are implemented to understand the contributions of bubble interactions and volumetric expansion on the size change of bubbles quantitatively. The results show that coalescence is larger than other effects, and naturally increases in importance with increasing gas fraction.

AB - The Eulerian-Eulerian two-fluid model (EE) is a powerful general model for multiphase flow computations. However, one limitation of the EE model is that it has no ability to estimate the local bubble sizes by itself. In this work, we have combined the discrete phase model (DPM) to estimate the evolution of bubble sizes with the EE model. In the DPM, the change of bubble size distribution is estimated by coalescence, breakup, and volumetric expansion modeling of the bubbles. The time-varying bubble distribution is used to compute the local interface area between gas and liquid phase, which is then used to estimate the momentum interactions such as drag, lift, wall lubrication, and turbulent dispersion forces for the EE model. In this work, this newly developed hybrid model Eulerian-Eulerian discrete-phase model (EEDPM) is applied to compute an upward flowing bubbly flow in a vertical pipe and the results are compared with previous experimental work of Hibiki et al. (2001, "Axial Interfacial Area Transport of Vertical Bubbly Flows," Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 44(10), pp. 1869-1888). The EEDPM model is able to reasonably predict the locally different bubble size distributions and the velocity and gas fraction fields. On the other hand, the standard EE model without the DPM shows good comparison with measurements only when the prescribed constant initial bubble size is accurate and does not change much. Parametric studies are implemented to understand the contributions of bubble interactions and volumetric expansion on the size change of bubbles quantitatively. The results show that coalescence is larger than other effects, and naturally increases in importance with increasing gas fraction.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046711703&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85046711703&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1115/1.4039793

DO - 10.1115/1.4039793

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85046711703

VL - 140

JO - Journal of Fluids Engineering, Transactions of the ASME

JF - Journal of Fluids Engineering, Transactions of the ASME

SN - 0098-2202

IS - 10

M1 - 101202

ER -