A grounding solution to the grounding problem

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The statue and the lump of clay that constitutes it fail to share all of their kind and modal properties. Therefore, by Leibniz’s Law, the statue is not the lump. Question: What grounds the kind and modal differences between the statue and the lump? In virtue of what is it that the lump of clay, but not the statue, can survive being smashed? This is the grounding problem. Now a number of solutions to the grounding problem require that we substantially revise our view of reality. In this paper, I provide a solution to this problem that does not require such a revision. I then show how my solution to the grounding problem can solve a related problem and answer a related question. The upshot is that the solution I offer is not only non-revisionary, but also fruitful.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2193-2214
Number of pages22
JournalPhilosophical Studies
Volume172
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2015

Fingerprint

Grounding
Statue

Keywords

  • Coincidence
  • Facts
  • Grounding
  • Kind
  • Modal
  • Parts

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Philosophy

Cite this

A grounding solution to the grounding problem. / Saenz, Noel Blas.

In: Philosophical Studies, Vol. 172, No. 8, 01.08.2015, p. 2193-2214.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d81871c383064a8eac19d8667689c02b,
title = "A grounding solution to the grounding problem",
abstract = "The statue and the lump of clay that constitutes it fail to share all of their kind and modal properties. Therefore, by Leibniz’s Law, the statue is not the lump. Question: What grounds the kind and modal differences between the statue and the lump? In virtue of what is it that the lump of clay, but not the statue, can survive being smashed? This is the grounding problem. Now a number of solutions to the grounding problem require that we substantially revise our view of reality. In this paper, I provide a solution to this problem that does not require such a revision. I then show how my solution to the grounding problem can solve a related problem and answer a related question. The upshot is that the solution I offer is not only non-revisionary, but also fruitful.",
keywords = "Coincidence, Facts, Grounding, Kind, Modal, Parts",
author = "Saenz, {Noel Blas}",
year = "2015",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11098-014-0405-x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "172",
pages = "2193--2214",
journal = "Philosophical Studies",
issn = "0031-8116",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A grounding solution to the grounding problem

AU - Saenz, Noel Blas

PY - 2015/8/1

Y1 - 2015/8/1

N2 - The statue and the lump of clay that constitutes it fail to share all of their kind and modal properties. Therefore, by Leibniz’s Law, the statue is not the lump. Question: What grounds the kind and modal differences between the statue and the lump? In virtue of what is it that the lump of clay, but not the statue, can survive being smashed? This is the grounding problem. Now a number of solutions to the grounding problem require that we substantially revise our view of reality. In this paper, I provide a solution to this problem that does not require such a revision. I then show how my solution to the grounding problem can solve a related problem and answer a related question. The upshot is that the solution I offer is not only non-revisionary, but also fruitful.

AB - The statue and the lump of clay that constitutes it fail to share all of their kind and modal properties. Therefore, by Leibniz’s Law, the statue is not the lump. Question: What grounds the kind and modal differences between the statue and the lump? In virtue of what is it that the lump of clay, but not the statue, can survive being smashed? This is the grounding problem. Now a number of solutions to the grounding problem require that we substantially revise our view of reality. In this paper, I provide a solution to this problem that does not require such a revision. I then show how my solution to the grounding problem can solve a related problem and answer a related question. The upshot is that the solution I offer is not only non-revisionary, but also fruitful.

KW - Coincidence

KW - Facts

KW - Grounding

KW - Kind

KW - Modal

KW - Parts

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84934438658&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84934438658&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11098-014-0405-x

DO - 10.1007/s11098-014-0405-x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84934438658

VL - 172

SP - 2193

EP - 2214

JO - Philosophical Studies

JF - Philosophical Studies

SN - 0031-8116

IS - 8

ER -