A “Goldilocks zone” for mind-wandering reports? A secondary data analysis of how few thought probes are enough for reliable and valid measurement

Matthew S. Welhaf, Matt E. Meier, Bridget A. Smeekens, Paul J. Silvia, Thomas R. Kwapil, Michael J. Kane

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A “Goldilocks zone” for mind-wandering reports? A secondary data analysis of how few thought probes are enough for reliable and valid measurement'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Keyphrases

Psychology

Neuroscience